Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
TIMOTHY HILL DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4700921 · 1 · LITTLE BUFFALO CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:59 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1898-05-01 — 532nd most senior of the 1262 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: AKERS DITCH (1897-05-01). Immediately behind: MCISAAC DITCH NO 2 (1898-06-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30280.17653 | 1898-05-01 | 1939-06-20 | 7.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 685 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 194 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 50 AF — 26% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 429 | 13th lowest of 15 · 221% of median | 66 | 6.0 |
| 2008 | 194 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 52 | 4.9 |
| 2009 | 264 | 9th lowest of 15 · 136% of median | 47 | 4.5 |
| 2010 | 298 | 10th lowest of 15 · 154% of median | 47 | 5.0 |
| 2011 | 331 | 12th lowest of 15 · 171% of median | 53 | 5.2 |
| 2015 | 298 | 10th lowest of 15 · 154% of median | 77 | 2.0 |
| 2016 | 52 | 4th lowest of 15 · 27% of median | 30 | 0.9 |
| 2018 | 4 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 2% of median | 5 | 0.5 |
| 2019 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2020 | 884 | 15th lowest of 15 · 456% of median | 81 | 6.0 |
| 2021 | 125 | 6th lowest of 15 · 64% of median | 28 | 2.3 |
| 2022 | 124 | 5th lowest of 15 · 64% of median | 59 | 5.5 |
| 2023 | 452 | 14th lowest of 15 · 233% of median | 70 | 11.0 |
| 2024 | 144 | 7th lowest of 15 · 74% of median | 72 | 3.5 |
| 2025 | 50 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 26% of median | 53 | 0.7 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.