← My Water · Print / save as PDF
WALES DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4700939 · 1 · MICHIGAN RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:08 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1890-09-30 — 233rd most senior of the 1262 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BUCKEYE DITCH (1890-09-30). Immediately behind: GOULD DITCH - BRIDGER CREEK (1890-10-01).
Decreed rights (4)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14883.0 | 1890-09-30 | 1892-09-19 | 6.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 237(212) |
| 15603.0 | 1892-09-19 | 1908-07-01 | 6.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 258 |
| 19236.0 | 1902-09-01 | 1908-07-01 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 321 |
| 21366.19236 | 1902-09-01 | 1913-01-06 | 6.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 342 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,160 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 898 AF — 77% of that, and 6th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1,160 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 50 | 18.0 |
| 2012 | 688 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 59% of median | 90 | 12.0 |
| 2013 | 787 | 4th lowest of 15 · 68% of median | 62 | 10.0 |
| 2014 | 1,742 | 15th lowest of 15 · 150% of median | 44 | 22.0 |
| 2015 | 914 | 7th lowest of 15 · 79% of median | 72 | 8.8 |
| 2016 | 1,594 | 13th lowest of 15 · 137% of median | 160 | 20.8 |
| 2017 | 1,471 | 10th lowest of 15 · 127% of median | 151 | 17.3 |
| 2018 | 1,666 | 14th lowest of 15 · 144% of median | 69 | 21.6 |
| 2019 | 1,328 | 9th lowest of 15 · 114% of median | 83 | 22.7 |
| 2020 | 850 | 5th lowest of 15 · 73% of median | 119 | 12.0 |
| 2021 | 668 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 58% of median | 55 | 14.5 |
| 2022 | 1,521 | 11th lowest of 15 · 131% of median | 40 | 19.7 |
| 2023 | 1,566 | 12th lowest of 15 · 135% of median | 69 | 11.6 |
| 2024 | 134 | 1st lowest of 15 · 12% of median | 21 | 3.4 |
| 2025 | 898 | 6th lowest of 15 · 77% of median | 45 | 12.4 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.