Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BOBBIE JO DITCH NO 2

Structure dossier · WDID 4701193 · 1 · MICHIGAN RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:28 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1973-06-10 — 1032nd most senior of the 1262 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BOBBIE JO DITCH NO 1 (1973-06-10). Immediately behind: BOBBIE JO DITCH NO 3 (1973-06-10).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
52230.450861973-06-101993-12-31 0.50.0 CIRRDOMSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 48 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2018, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1999 15 5th lowest of 15 · 31% of median 26 0.5
2000 35 7th lowest of 15 · 73% of median 33 1.0
2001 10 3rd lowest of 15 · 21% of median 13 0.5
2003 95 11th lowest of 15 · 198% of median 55 1.5
2005 49 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 41 1.5
2006 7 2nd lowest of 15 · 15% of median 6 0.8
2007 153 14th lowest of 15 · 319% of median 69 2.5
2008 48 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 36 0.8
2009 132 13th lowest of 15 · 275% of median 49 2.0
2010 126 12th lowest of 15 · 262% of median 47 2.5
2011 178 15th lowest of 15 · 371% of median 51 2.5
2013 61 10th lowest of 15 · 127% of median 42 0.8
2014 12 4th lowest of 15 · 25% of median 17 0.5
2016 19 6th lowest of 15 · 40% of median 22 0.5
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.