← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

STEVENSEN NO 1 DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4702042 · 1 · WILLOW CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 03:02 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1886-05-01818th most senior of the 1262 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LANNING SPRING NO 2 (1978-07-24). Immediately behind: MEERPOHL SPG (1904-05-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
47116.13271886-05-011979-12-31 10.00.0 CIRRSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 182 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 172 AF — 94% of that, and 6th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2007 203 10th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 54 4.0
2008 169 5th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 27 7.9
2009 299 12th lowest of 15 · 164% of median 55 4.0
2010 228 11th lowest of 15 · 125% of median 52 4.0
2011 474 14th lowest of 15 · 260% of median 52 5.0
2013 182 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 41 3.0
2015 42 3rd lowest of 15 · 23% of median 43 0.5
2016 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2017 932 15th lowest of 15 · 512% of median 58 9.0
2019 313 13th lowest of 15 · 172% of median 33 5.1
2021 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2022 55 4th lowest of 15 · 30% of median 14 2.1
2023 195 9th lowest of 15 · 107% of median 81 1.2
2024 181 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 50 2.2
2025 172 6th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 43 2.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 943 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 16% of the irrigation seasons in 1997-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.