← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ALBERT CREEK DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5000501 · 1 · ALBERT CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:00 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1889-07-3171st most senior of the 360 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HEINI AND OAKS DITCH (1887-06-24). Immediately behind: ALBERT CREEK DITCH NO 3 (1889-07-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
20676.144571889-07-311911-08-03 8.50.0 CIRR 80

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 588 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2022, came in at 218 AF — 37% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2007 670 11th lowest of 15 · 114% of median 79 7.1
2008 1,049 15th lowest of 15 · 178% of median 63 10.4
2009 958 14th lowest of 15 · 163% of median 65 10.4
2010 642 9th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 55 8.2
2011 828 13th lowest of 15 · 141% of median 48 12.1
2012 374 3rd lowest of 15 · 64% of median 75 4.3
2013 539 5th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 51 7.5
2014 581 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median 47 6.9
2015 521 4th lowest of 15 · 89% of median 65 5.7
2016 588 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 61 6.5
2017 699 12th lowest of 15 · 119% of median 59 9.1
2018 552 6th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 51 9.2
2019 645 10th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 66 7.0
2021 329 2nd lowest of 15 · 56% of median 35 6.2
2022 218 1st lowest of 15 · 37% of median 36 5.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.