Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
LANDSLIDE DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 5000598 · 1 · EAST FORK TROUBLESOME CR · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:02 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1908-06-23 — 98th most senior of the 360 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ADOLPH DITCH (1906-09-03). Immediately behind: TOM ENNIS DITCH HGT NO 3 (1908-08-01).
Decreed rights (3)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21358.0 | 1908-06-23 | 1911-08-03 | 3.875 | 3.025 | C | IRR | 104 |
| 33435.24258 | 1916-06-01 | 1942-07-14 | 3.125 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 190 |
| 33435.33389 | 1941-06-01 | 1942-07-14 | 8.875 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 191 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 890 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 1,045 AF — 117% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 741 | 4th lowest of 15 · 83% of median | 50 | 8.7 |
| 2011 | 1,151 | 12th lowest of 15 · 129% of median | 65 | 10.3 |
| 2012 | 673 | 1st lowest of 15 · 76% of median | 52 | 9.1 |
| 2013 | 724 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 81% of median | 54 | 8.2 |
| 2014 | 1,516 | 15th lowest of 15 · 170% of median | 107 | 10.1 |
| 2015 | 800 | 7th lowest of 15 · 90% of median | 55 | 10.5 |
| 2016 | 890 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 65 | 8.2 |
| 2017 | 1,073 | 11th lowest of 15 · 121% of median | 71 | 11.7 |
| 2018 | 743 | 5th lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 68 | 7.0 |
| 2019 | 758 | 6th lowest of 15 · 85% of median | 61 | 14.0 |
| 2020 | 726 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 82% of median | 67 | 13.0 |
| 2021 | 978 | 9th lowest of 15 · 110% of median | 83 | 10.2 |
| 2022 | 1,201 | 14th lowest of 15 · 135% of median | 73 | 14.0 |
| 2023 | 1,196 | 13th lowest of 15 · 134% of median | 68 | 12.0 |
| 2024 | 1,045 | 10th lowest of 15 · 117% of median | 77 | 13.5 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.