Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

SEEP CR WOODS DITCH NO 1

Structure dossier · WDID 5000642 · 1 · DUNNING CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:02 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1890-12-01 — 281st most senior of the 360 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HEINI WELL NO 1 (1880-04-21). Immediately behind: RAWALT STOCK RES NO 1 (1923-04-14).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
52960.149451890-12-011995-12-31 2.00.0 CIRRSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 71 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2020, came in at 72 AF — 101% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2006 60 6th lowest of 15 · 84% of median 49 0.7
2007 61 7th lowest of 15 · 86% of median 44 1.0
2008 108 15th lowest of 15 · 152% of median 47 1.5
2009 37 1st lowest of 15 · 52% of median 34 1.1
2010 79 12th lowest of 15 · 111% of median 51 0.8
2011 84 14th lowest of 15 · 118% of median 88 0.9
2012 41 3rd lowest of 15 · 58% of median 44 0.5
2013 73 10th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 52 1.0
2014 74 11th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 43 1.3
2015 71 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 36 1.3
2016 57 5th lowest of 15 · 80% of median 47 0.7
2017 52 4th lowest of 15 · 73% of median 49 1.1
2018 38 2nd lowest of 15 · 54% of median 50 0.6
2019 82 13th lowest of 15 · 116% of median 35 1.6
2020 72 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median 50 1.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.