Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

HAYPARK CANAL HGT NO 2 (MONUMENT CK)

Structure dossier · WDID 5000736 · 1 · MONUMENT CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:02 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1959-08-05 — 185th most senior of the 360 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: KREMMLING CANAL (1959-08-05). Immediately behind: HAYPARK RESERVOIR (1959-08-05).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
40028.01959-08-051964-09-05 0.00.0 CIRRMUNINDRECFISDOMSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 166 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2015, came in at 6,749 AF — 4066% of that, and 15th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2001 166 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 51 2.7
2002 21 2nd lowest of 15 · 13% of median 22 0.5
2003 53 3rd lowest of 15 · 32% of median 41 0.8
2004 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2005 95 5th lowest of 15 · 57% of median 66 1.3
2006 139 7th lowest of 15 · 84% of median 42 2.1
2007 185 9th lowest of 15 · 111% of median 66 1.8
2008 70 4th lowest of 15 · 42% of median 44 1.2
2009 133 6th lowest of 15 · 80% of median 100 1.6
2010 6,654 14th lowest of 15 · 4008% of median 104 58.0
2011 5,431 11th lowest of 15 · 3272% of median 65 45.8
2012 5,402 10th lowest of 15 · 3254% of median 82 57.0
2013 5,917 13th lowest of 15 · 3564% of median 78 67.2
2014 5,601 12th lowest of 15 · 3374% of median 78 50.2
2015 6,749 15th lowest of 15 · 4066% of median 70 65.3

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.