Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

PETE-ROUND GULCH POINT

Structure dossier · WDID 5000767 · 1 · ROUND CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:01 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1941-06-01 — 152nd most senior of the 360 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: JOE MCELROYS DOM WELL (1940-12-31). Immediately behind: DIETRICH DITCH NO 2 (1898-09-21).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
33435.333891941-06-011942-07-14 0.00.0 CIRR 191

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 33 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2019, came in at 218 AF — 661% of that, and 15th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2005 32 7th lowest of 15 · 97% of median 17 1.0
2006 39 11th lowest of 15 · 118% of median 16 1.3
2007 17 2nd lowest of 15 · 52% of median 18 0.5
2008 65 14th lowest of 15 · 197% of median 41 1.3
2009 38 10th lowest of 15 · 115% of median 47 0.6
2010 64 13th lowest of 15 · 194% of median 47 0.8
2011 48 12th lowest of 15 · 146% of median 31 0.8
2012 20 3rd lowest of 15 · 61% of median 26 0.4
2013 29 5th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 39 0.5
2014 33 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 29 0.6
2015 26 4th lowest of 15 · 79% of median 27 0.5
2016 13 1st lowest of 15 · 39% of median 12 0.6
2017 36 9th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 25 1.1
2018 31 6th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 32 0.5
2019 218 15th lowest of 15 · 661% of median 56 2.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.