← My Water · Print / save as PDF
BUTTON NO 2 DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 5100555 · 1 · RASBERRY CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:39 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1888-06-20 — 67th most senior of the 2208 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BEAVER DAM DITCH (1888-06-18). Immediately behind: BUTTON NO 3 DITCH (1888-06-20).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14051.0 | 1888-06-20 | 1906-08-11 | 0.33 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 63 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 37 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2005, came in at 31 AF — 84% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1986 | 44 | 10th lowest of 15 · 119% of median | 64 | 0.4 |
| 1987 | 103 | 15th lowest of 15 · 278% of median | 63 | 1.0 |
| 1988 | 38 | 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 61 | 0.5 |
| 1989 | 53 | 11th lowest of 15 · 143% of median | 52 | 0.8 |
| 1990 | 93 | 14th lowest of 15 · 251% of median | 60 | 1.0 |
| 1991 | 10 | 1st lowest of 15 · 27% of median | 26 | 0.2 |
| 1992 | 32 | 5th lowest of 15 · 86% of median | 27 | 0.7 |
| 1993 | 22 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 60% of median | 26 | 0.5 |
| 1994 | 80 | 13th lowest of 15 · 216% of median | 127 | 0.8 |
| 1996 | 33 | 6th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | 52 | 0.3 |
| 1997 | 34 | 7th lowest of 15 · 92% of median | 54 | 0.5 |
| 1999 | 77 | 12th lowest of 15 · 208% of median | 62 | 1.0 |
| 2000 | 37 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 26 | 1.0 |
| 2004 | 22 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 60% of median | 36 | 0.5 |
| 2005 | 31 | 4th lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 47 | 0.5 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.