Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

FULLERTON NO 2 DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5100648 · 1 · CABIN CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:26 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1882-09-05 — 11th most senior of the 2208 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HALKOWEIZ DITCH (1882-05-31). Immediately behind: FULLERTON NO 3 DITCH - NEW PT DIVERSION (1882-09-05).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
11936.01882-09-051906-08-11 2.00.0 CIRR 11

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 115 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2009 97 5th lowest of 15 · 84% of median 87 0.8
2010 115 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 94 2.0
2011 115 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 50 1.3
2012 67 3rd lowest of 15 · 58% of median 74 0.8
2013 134 11th lowest of 15 · 116% of median 77 1.5
2014 165 13th lowest of 15 · 144% of median 55 1.8
2015 123 9th lowest of 15 · 107% of median 77 2.0
2016 130 10th lowest of 15 · 113% of median 52 2.7
2017 157 12th lowest of 15 · 136% of median 77 1.7
2018 177 15th lowest of 15 · 154% of median 93 1.8
2019 172 14th lowest of 15 · 150% of median 82 3.0
2020 78 4th lowest of 15 · 68% of median 90 1.4
2021 11 2nd lowest of 15 · 10% of median 15 1.2
2022 106 6th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 115 0.5
2024 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 10 0.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.