← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

GASKILL DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5100660 · 1 · SAINT LOUIS CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:19 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1891-06-01109th most senior of the 2208 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: JONES HIGHLINE DITCH (1891-05-29). Immediately behind: SOPHRONIA DAY DITCH (1891-06-03).

Decreed rights (10)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
15127.01891-06-011906-08-11 2.00.0 CIRR 91
20676.198751904-06-011911-08-03 1.00.0 CIRRFIRDOM 231
38240.01954-09-121957-01-14 2.280.0 CIRRMUNFIRDOM 538
45290.378051953-07-041974-12-31 0.50.0 CRECFIS
50982.01989-08-011990-12-31 0.00.0 AAUG
58630.02010-07-102010-12-31 3.50.0 CIRRSNO
58793.02010-12-202010-12-31 2.50.0 CIRRSNO
60143.02014-08-312018-12-31 0.00.0 CMUNCOMFIRDOMAUGSNO
60143.02014-08-312018-12-31 0.00.0 AMUNCOMFIRDOMAUGSNO
62631.02021-06-232021-12-31 0.02.0 CCOMIND

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 794 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 350 AF — 44% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 1,154 12th lowest of 15 · 145% of median 146 6.0
2011 1,269 14th lowest of 15 · 160% of median 139 15.0
2012 908 9th lowest of 15 · 114% of median 176 6.0
2013 485 3rd lowest of 15 · 61% of median 134 7.5
2014 564 4th lowest of 15 · 71% of median 183 5.0
2015 352 2nd lowest of 15 · 44% of median 201 4.5
2016 734 7th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 366 5.5
2017 794 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 325 7.9
2018 651 5th lowest of 15 · 82% of median 361 11.1
2019 1,252 13th lowest of 15 · 158% of median 365 9.0
2020 1,653 15th lowest of 15 · 208% of median 323 11.9
2021 1,065 11th lowest of 15 · 134% of median 365 14.0
2022 916 10th lowest of 15 · 115% of median 365 7.8
2023 716 6th lowest of 15 · 90% of median 319 6.7
2024 350 1st lowest of 15 · 44% of median 154 5.1

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.