← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

GEORGE BUNTE NO 2 DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5100663 · 1 · STILLWATER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:24 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1890-05-15302nd most senior of the 2208 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ADAMS DITCH (1889-05-01). Immediately behind: WILLOW DITCH (SMITH CREEK) (1892-06-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
23817.147451890-05-151917-08-11 1.20.0 CIRR 320

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 349 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 647 AF — 185% of that, and 14th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 860 15th lowest of 15 · 246% of median 68 8.0
2011 524 13th lowest of 15 · 150% of median 69 4.0
2012 301 7th lowest of 15 · 86% of median 80 3.5
2013 382 10th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 74 5.0
2014 397 11th lowest of 15 · 114% of median 70 4.0
2015 85 1st lowest of 15 · 24% of median 45 1.3
2016 120 2nd lowest of 15 · 34% of median 57 2.0
2017 171 4th lowest of 15 · 49% of median 57 3.3
2018 491 12th lowest of 15 · 141% of median 72 6.0
2019 152 3rd lowest of 15 · 44% of median 55 2.0
2020 367 9th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 67 7.0
2021 349 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 71 4.8
2022 289 6th lowest of 15 · 83% of median 79 4.1
2023 204 5th lowest of 15 · 58% of median 64 2.0
2024 647 14th lowest of 15 · 185% of median 72 8.6

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.