← My Water · Print / save as PDF
JONES NO 2 DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 5100746 · 1 · JONES CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 19:17 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1883-12-30 — 263rd most senior of the 2208 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SPRING DITCH (1883-05-31). Immediately behind: JONES NO 3 DITCH (1883-12-30).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23454.12417 | 1883-12-30 | 1915-03-18 | 1.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 270 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 44 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2022, came in at 13 AF — 30% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 21 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 48% of median | 24 | 0.5 |
| 2007 | 48 | 9th lowest of 15 · 109% of median | 49 | 0.5 |
| 2008 | 131 | 14th lowest of 15 · 298% of median | 61 | 1.5 |
| 2009 | 88 | 13th lowest of 15 · 200% of median | 53 | 1.5 |
| 2010 | 72 | 11th lowest of 15 · 164% of median | 75 | 0.5 |
| 2011 | 134 | 15th lowest of 15 · 304% of median | 54 | 1.5 |
| 2012 | 35 | 5th lowest of 15 · 80% of median | 73 | 0.2 |
| 2013 | 39 | 6th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | 52 | 0.5 |
| 2014 | 77 | 12th lowest of 15 · 175% of median | 81 | 0.8 |
| 2015 | 40 | 7th lowest of 15 · 91% of median | 51 | 0.5 |
| 2016 | 64 | 10th lowest of 15 · 146% of median | 59 | 1.0 |
| 2017 | 44 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 49 | 0.5 |
| 2019 | 22 | 4th lowest of 15 · 50% of median | 36 | 0.5 |
| 2020 | 12 | 1st lowest of 15 · 27% of median | 40 | 0.2 |
| 2022 | 13 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 30% of median | 31 | 0.3 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.