← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

REEDER CREEK NO 1 DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5100851 · 1 · REEDER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 19:49 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1886-05-31180th most senior of the 2208 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: FARRIS SOUTH SIDE DITCH (1886-05-15). Immediately behind: BUNTE NO 1 DITCH (1886-10-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
20676.1331886-05-311911-08-03 1.640.0 CIRR 165

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 73 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2022, came in at 79 AF — 108% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1999 14 2nd lowest of 15 · 19% of median 11 0.8
2000 33 6th lowest of 15 · 45% of median 22 0.8
2001 13 1st lowest of 15 · 18% of median 14 0.5
2002 18 3rd lowest of 15 · 25% of median 32 0.3
2004 31 5th lowest of 15 · 42% of median 32 0.5
2005 87 12th lowest of 15 · 119% of median 56 0.8
2006 81 10th lowest of 15 · 111% of median 44 1.0
2007 87 12th lowest of 15 · 119% of median 49 1.0
2008 22 4th lowest of 15 · 30% of median 16 0.8
2009 39 7th lowest of 15 · 53% of median 29 0.7
2012 83 11th lowest of 15 · 114% of median 27 2.0
2014 236 15th lowest of 15 · 323% of median 118 1.4
2015 73 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 38 1.0
2021 132 14th lowest of 15 · 181% of median 109 1.6
2022 79 9th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 48 1.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.