← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

REINHARDT NO 3 DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5100855 · 1 · REED CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:09 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1926-03-01418th most senior of the 2208 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MUELLER NO 2 DITCH (1926-03-01). Immediately behind: ELTING NO 2 DITCH HDG 1 (1929-10-28).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
30870.278181926-03-011937-11-05 3.50.0 CIRR 406

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 63 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 78 AF — 124% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2009 91 11th lowest of 15 · 144% of median 63 1.0
2010 201 15th lowest of 15 · 319% of median 105 5.0
2011 150 14th lowest of 15 · 238% of median 63 2.0
2013 98 12th lowest of 15 · 156% of median 106 0.6
2014 61 7th lowest of 15 · 97% of median 71 1.0
2015 60 6th lowest of 15 · 95% of median 53 1.0
2016 144 13th lowest of 15 · 229% of median 71 1.4
2017 64 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 62 1.0
2018 36 4th lowest of 15 · 57% of median 52 0.5
2019 33 3rd lowest of 15 · 52% of median 61 0.3
2020 32 2nd lowest of 15 · 51% of median 63 0.3
2021 28 1st lowest of 15 · 44% of median 59 0.3
2022 40 5th lowest of 15 · 64% of median 71 0.5
2023 63 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 63 1.0
2024 78 10th lowest of 15 · 124% of median 44 1.5

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.