← My Water · Print / save as PDF
ROHRACKER NO 1 DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 5100862 · 1 · ROHRACHER CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:29 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1885-09-20 — 53rd most senior of the 2208 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: GRAND LAKE METRO REC DISTRICT AP (1885-09-01). Immediately behind: AMES DITCH (1885-12-31).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13047.0 | 1885-09-20 | 1906-08-11 | 0.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 39 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 37 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 47 AF — 127% of that, and 11th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 45 | 10th lowest of 15 · 122% of median | 46 | 0.5 |
| 2008 | 159 | 13th lowest of 15 · 430% of median | 82 | 2.5 |
| 2010 | 193 | 15th lowest of 15 · 522% of median | 54 | 3.0 |
| 2012 | 43 | 9th lowest of 15 · 116% of median | 95 | 0.5 |
| 2013 | 60 | 12th lowest of 15 · 162% of median | 75 | 0.5 |
| 2014 | 160 | 14th lowest of 15 · 432% of median | 52 | 3.0 |
| 2015 | 23 | 5th lowest of 15 · 62% of median | 53 | 0.3 |
| 2016 | 35 | 7th lowest of 15 · 95% of median | 46 | 0.5 |
| 2017 | 37 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 64 | 0.3 |
| 2018 | 10 | 4th lowest of 15 · 27% of median | 33 | 0.2 |
| 2019 | 29 | 6th lowest of 15 · 78% of median | 43 | 1.0 |
| 2021 | 8 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 22% of median | 23 | 0.2 |
| 2022 | 6 | 1st lowest of 15 · 16% of median | 35 | 0.1 |
| 2023 | 9 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 24% of median | 23 | 0.3 |
| 2024 | 47 | 11th lowest of 15 · 127% of median | 54 | 1.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.