Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

T A ENGLE DITCH NO 2

Structure dossier · WDID 5100926 · 1 · COLORADO RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:50 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1900-01-01 — 472nd most senior of the 2208 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: T A ENGLE DITCH NO 1 WEST BANK (1900-01-01). Immediately behind: T A ENGLE DITCH NO 3 (1900-01-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
34241.182631900-01-011952-11-07 2.00.0 CIRR 449B

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 186 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 24 AF — 13% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 194 11th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 53 2.0
2011 115 4th lowest of 15 · 62% of median 31 2.0
2012 127 5th lowest of 15 · 68% of median 34 2.0
2013 186 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 51 2.0
2014 190 10th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 51 2.0
2015 198 12th lowest of 15 · 106% of median 53 2.0
2016 202 13th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 55 2.0
2017 186 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 51 2.0
2018 226 15th lowest of 15 · 122% of median 62 2.0
2019 206 14th lowest of 15 · 111% of median 57 2.0
2020 99 3rd lowest of 15 · 53% of median 34 2.0
2021 186 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 60 2.0
2022 151 6th lowest of 15 · 81% of median 56 2.0
2023 91 2nd lowest of 15 · 49% of median 34 2.0
2024 24 1st lowest of 15 · 13% of median 19 2.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.