← My Water · Print / save as PDF
TERRELL NO 2 DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 5100930 · 1 · TRAIL CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:14 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1889-08-01 — 84th most senior of the 2208 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: RAEDEL DITCH (1889-06-24). Immediately behind: TERRELL NO 2 DITCH - FREDERICKS DIVERSIO (1889-08-01).
Decreed rights (6)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14458.0 | 1889-08-01 | 1906-08-11 | 1.14 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 73 |
| 20676.14458 | 1889-08-01 | 1911-08-03 | 1.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 182 |
| 28191.23922 | 1915-07-01 | 1927-08-15 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 372 |
| 28191.25383 | 1919-07-01 | 1927-08-15 | 0.8 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 373 |
| 57343.57154 | 2006-06-25 | 2007-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | AUG | |
| 57343.57154 | 2006-06-25 | 2007-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | AUG |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 75 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 4 AF — 5% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 73 | 6th lowest of 15 · 97% of median | 73 | 0.8 |
| 2007 | 192 | 11th lowest of 15 · 256% of median | 87 | 1.5 |
| 2008 | 26 | 4th lowest of 15 · 35% of median | 47 | 0.3 |
| 2009 | 418 | 14th lowest of 15 · 557% of median | 78 | 4.0 |
| 2010 | 137 | 9th lowest of 15 · 183% of median | 74 | 1.4 |
| 2011 | 667 | 15th lowest of 15 · 889% of median | 88 | 5.0 |
| 2012 | 171 | 10th lowest of 15 · 228% of median | 87 | 1.5 |
| 2013 | 407 | 13th lowest of 15 · 543% of median | 67 | 3.5 |
| 2014 | 45 | 5th lowest of 15 · 60% of median | 49 | 0.5 |
| 2015 | 372 | 12th lowest of 15 · 496% of median | 78 | 3.0 |
| 2016 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 8 | 0.0 |
| 2019 | 73 | 6th lowest of 15 · 97% of median | 47 | 1.0 |
| 2021 | 75 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 42 | 1.5 |
| 2022 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 4 | 0.0 |
| 2024 | 4 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 5% of median | 10 | 0.3 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.