← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MULFORD LATERAL DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5101118 · 1 · COLORADO RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:18 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1968-06-17805th most senior of the 2208 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HURD CREEK RANCH PL NO 2 (1967-08-08). Immediately behind: CHILDRESS WELL (1970-02-26).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
43829.432671968-06-171970-12-31 1.2330.0 CIRRDOM

Recorded use (last 10 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 142 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 245 AF — 172% of that, and 9th lowest of the 10 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1991 166 8th lowest of 10 · 117% of median 72 1.2
1992 87 2nd lowest of 10 · 61% of median 45 1.0
1993 101 4th lowest of 10 · 71% of median 68 0.8
1994 93 3rd lowest of 10 · 66% of median 48 1.0
1996 139 5th lowest of 10 · 98% of median 62 1.6
1997 145 6th lowest of 10 · 102% of median 62 1.2
1999 55 1st lowest of 10 · 39% of median 93 0.3
2022 162 7th lowest of 10 · 114% of median 100 3.0
2023 331 10th lowest of 10 · 233% of median 184 2.4
2024 245 9th lowest of 10 · 172% of median 70 3.1

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 804 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 11% of the irrigation seasons in 1991-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.