← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

EAST BRANCH RESERVOIR

Structure dossier · WDID 5103715 · 3 · UTE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 01:50 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1897-05-15208th most senior of the 2208 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HENDERSON MILL INTAKE 2 (1897-05-15). Immediately behind: LOST CREEK RESERVOIR (1897-05-15).

Decreed rights (9)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
20676.173021897-05-151911-08-03 0.00.0 AIRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM 205A
20676.173021897-05-151911-08-03 0.00.0 CIRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM 205A
20676.173231897-06-051911-08-03 0.00.0 CIRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM 205C
20676.173331897-06-151911-08-03 0.00.0 CIRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM 205B, 205D
20676.176831898-05-311911-08-03 0.00.0 CIRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM 211
20676.187791901-06-011911-08-03 0.00.0 CIRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM 218
31259.301331932-07-021937-11-05 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDFIRDOM 410
38236.01954-09-081957-01-14 0.00.0 AIRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM 537
53325.528581994-09-201996-12-31 0.00.0 CIRRINDFIRDOMAUGTMX

How good is our record of it?

Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 9 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record absent no diversion records cached
record continuity unknown no record span to measure against
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.