← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

GORDON C. WINN PUMP 1

Structure dossier · WDID 5500514 · 8 · LITTLE SNAKE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:52 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1939-10-3117th most senior of the 477 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: B W MUSSER WELL NO 2 (1936-07-01). Immediately behind: B W MUSSER WELL NO 3 (1945-08-30).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
32810.01939-10-311972-05-27 2.20.0 CIRRSTK 9

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 390 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 250 AF — 64% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2005 327 5th lowest of 15 · 84% of median 45 3.9
2006 390 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 56 3.9
2007 499 10th lowest of 15 · 128% of median 69 3.9
2008 393 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median 94 2.2
2009 499 10th lowest of 15 · 128% of median 69 3.9
2010 1,545 15th lowest of 15 · 396% of median 137 8.0
2011 809 12th lowest of 15 · 207% of median 54 8.0
2012 1,381 14th lowest of 15 · 354% of median 90 8.0
2013 357 7th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 92 2.0
2014 1,333 13th lowest of 15 · 342% of median 158 6.0
2015 240 3rd lowest of 15 · 62% of median 58 2.2
2016 356 6th lowest of 15 · 91% of median 36 6.7
2017 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 5 0.0
2025 250 4th lowest of 15 · 64% of median 37 4.9

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3078 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 26% of the irrigation seasons in 1970-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.