← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

KNOTT DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5701012 · 1 · TROUT CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:35 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1938-08-01429th most senior of the 1003 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CURTIS GULCH SPRING 1 (1922-06-01). Immediately behind: DRY CREEK DIVERSION (1954-06-25).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
47116.323541938-08-011979-12-31 2.00.0 CFIS

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 505 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,361 AF — 270% of that, and 15th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 206 3rd lowest of 15 · 41% of median 296 1.5
2012 314 5th lowest of 15 · 62% of median 133 2.0
2013 924 12th lowest of 15 · 183% of median 330 2.5
2014 1,230 14th lowest of 15 · 244% of median 285 3.4
2015 729 10th lowest of 15 · 144% of median 245 2.5
2016 986 13th lowest of 15 · 195% of median 206 4.3
2017 453 6th lowest of 15 · 90% of median 234 3.6
2018 559 9th lowest of 15 · 111% of median 286 1.4
2019 201 2nd lowest of 15 · 40% of median 155 0.9
2020 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 9 0.0
2021 303 4th lowest of 15 · 60% of median 119 2.2
2022 503 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 312 1.2
2023 505 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 290 1.0
2024 915 11th lowest of 15 · 181% of median 342 3.3
2025 1,361 15th lowest of 15 · 270% of median 261 3.3

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 13352 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 1981-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.