Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
BALANCED ROCK DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 5801072 · 1 · MORRISON CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 01:50 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1945-06-01 — 850th most senior of the 3097 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BROOKSHIRE SPRING 1 (1945-01-01). Immediately behind: JOHN ZUFFERY SPRING (1946-05-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41727.3485 | 1945-06-01 | 1972-05-30 | 3.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 26 |
Legal record & documents
1 decreed actions on record across
1 court case:
CA3926.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA3926 | 1 | 1972-05-30 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 157 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2012, came in at 115 AF — 73% of that, and 6th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 417 | 14th lowest of 15 · 266% of median | 113 | 4.0 |
| 1996 | 332 | 13th lowest of 15 · 212% of median | 167 | 3.0 |
| 1997 | 524 | 15th lowest of 15 · 334% of median | 107 | 3.0 |
| 1998 | 118 | 7th lowest of 15 · 75% of median | 19 | 3.5 |
| 1999 | 260 | 12th lowest of 15 · 166% of median | 62 | 3.0 |
| 2000 | 157 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 43 | 3.0 |
| 2001 | 160 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 46 | 3.0 |
| 2002 | 86 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 55% of median | 38 | 1.5 |
| 2003 | 203 | 10th lowest of 15 · 129% of median | 220 | 3.0 |
| 2004 | 77 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 49% of median | 140 | 0.5 |
| 2005 | 102 | 4th lowest of 15 · 65% of median | 62 | 1.5 |
| 2009 | 102 | 4th lowest of 15 · 65% of median | 27 | 3.0 |
| 2010 | 37 | 1st lowest of 15 · 24% of median | 33 | 1.0 |
| 2011 | 246 | 11th lowest of 15 · 157% of median | 130 | 1.0 |
| 2012 | 115 | 6th lowest of 15 · 73% of median | 30 | 2.0 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use is falling over its last 15 recorded years (-14 AF/yr, Mann-Kendall p=0.020).
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 2452 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 29% of the irrigation seasons in 1973-2012 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.