← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BETTY DIVERSION

Structure dossier · WDID 5801477 · 1 · MORRISON CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:05 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1937-07-011851st most senior of the 3097 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LENA DIVERSION (1937-07-01). Immediately behind: HATTIE DIVERSION (1937-07-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
50038.319581937-07-011987-12-31 1.00.0 CIRRDOMSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 26 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2002 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 22 0.0
2003 77 15th lowest of 15 · 296% of median 242 1.0
2004 52 13th lowest of 15 · 200% of median 184 0.3
2005 27 9th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 138 0.1
2007 26 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 108 0.2
2009 74 14th lowest of 15 · 285% of median 57 1.0
2010 28 10th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 62 0.5
2012 6 5th lowest of 15 · 23% of median 31 0.1
2013 29 11th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 30 0.5
2014 6 5th lowest of 15 · 23% of median 61 0.1
2015 37 12th lowest of 15 · 142% of median 304 0.3
2016 23 7th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 184 0.3
2017 1 4th lowest of 15 · 4% of median 13 0.1
2024 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2025 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 4413 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 63% of the irrigation seasons in 1992-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.