← My Water · Print / save as PDF
HANKINS DITCH NO 1
Structure dossier · WDID 6000623 · 1 · MAVERICK DRAW · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:14 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Will it be called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1908-04-08 — 708th most senior of the 2893 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SPRING CREEK DITCH NO 2 (1905-07-30). Immediately behind: GILLESPIE DITCH (1909-06-20).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23681.21282 | 1908-04-08 | 1916-09-30 | 0.3 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 105 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2006, came in at 125 AF — 119% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | 21 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 20% of median | 58 | 0.2 |
| 1990 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 5 | 0.0 |
| 1991 | 154 | 10th lowest of 15 · 147% of median | 141 | 0.8 |
| 1992 | 282 | 14th lowest of 15 · 269% of median | 138 | 1.2 |
| 1993 | 178 | 12th lowest of 15 · 170% of median | 146 | 0.8 |
| 1994 | 105 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 73 | 0.8 |
| 1995 | 241 | 13th lowest of 15 · 230% of median | 153 | 0.8 |
| 1996 | 86 | 5th lowest of 15 · 82% of median | 70 | 0.8 |
| 1997 | 168 | 11th lowest of 15 · 160% of median | 109 | 0.8 |
| 1998 | 97 | 7th lowest of 15 · 92% of median | 131 | 0.6 |
| 1999 | 91 | 6th lowest of 15 · 87% of median | 126 | 0.6 |
| 2000 | 331 | 15th lowest of 15 · 315% of median | 99 | 2.0 |
| 2002 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2003 | 44 | 4th lowest of 15 · 42% of median | 62 | 0.5 |
| 2006 | 125 | 9th lowest of 15 · 119% of median | 58 | 1.4 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.