Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

WEATHERBY HALL PUMP STA

Structure dossier · WDID 6001311 · 1 · MAVERICK DRAW · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:55 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1982-05-14 — 1531st most senior of the 2893 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: RAY DITCH NO 1 ENL (1982-05-01). Immediately behind: THEO NETHERLY DITCH NO3 (1900-05-16).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
48346.01982-05-141982-12-31 0.00.4 CIRR
48577.483461982-05-141983-12-31 0.30.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 0 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1999, came in at 0 AF — —% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1985 43 14th lowest of 15 · —% of median 136 0.2
1986 49 15th lowest of 15 · —% of median 126 0.2
1987 41 13th lowest of 15 · —% of median 124 0.2
1988 20 12th lowest of 15 · —% of median 132 0.1
1989 7 11th lowest of 15 · —% of median 79 0.1
1990 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 5 0.0
1991 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 4 0.0
1992 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 6 0.0
1993 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 7 0.0
1994 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 3 0.0
1995 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 3 0.0
1996 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 2 0.0
1997 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 2 0.0
1998 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 1 0.0
1999 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 2 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 2 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 632 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 21% of the irrigation seasons in 1985-1999 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.