← My Water · Print / save as PDF
NORTH MT DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 6000721 · 1 · NATURITA CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 19:16 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1913-07-21 — 719th most senior of the 2893 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LAVENDER & WHEELER PL (1913-07-21). Immediately behind: O'NEIL DITCH (1913-07-21).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24379.23212 | 1913-07-21 | 1920-09-16 | 2.6 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 132 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 189 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2000, came in at 173 AF — 92% of that, and 6th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1986 | 216 | 11th lowest of 15 · 114% of median | 135 | 2.0 |
| 1987 | 189 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 171 | 1.0 |
| 1988 | 97 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 51% of median | 30 | 1.8 |
| 1989 | 154 | 4th lowest of 15 · 82% of median | 117 | 1.0 |
| 1990 | 149 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 79% of median | 163 | 0.8 |
| 1991 | 55 | 1st lowest of 15 · 29% of median | 106 | 0.3 |
| 1992 | 194 | 10th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 177 | 0.6 |
| 1993 | 193 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 171 | 1.2 |
| 1994 | 240 | 15th lowest of 15 · 127% of median | 179 | 1.0 |
| 1995 | 225 | 13th lowest of 15 · 119% of median | 182 | 0.8 |
| 1996 | 175 | 7th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 180 | 1.0 |
| 1997 | 216 | 11th lowest of 15 · 114% of median | 164 | 1.0 |
| 1998 | 171 | 5th lowest of 15 · 90% of median | 174 | 0.8 |
| 1999 | 237 | 14th lowest of 15 · 125% of median | 165 | 1.0 |
| 2000 | 173 | 6th lowest of 15 · 92% of median | 184 | 0.8 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.