← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

O'NEIL DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 6000726 · 1 · MAVERICK DRAW · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 01:00 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1913-07-21720th most senior of the 2893 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: NORTH MT DITCH (1913-07-21). Immediately behind: GARBER NO 2 DITCH (1913-07-21).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
24379.232121913-07-211920-09-16 1.170.0 CIRR 150

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 0 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1999, came in at 0 AF — —% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1975 64 15th lowest of 15 · —% of median 78 0.5
1986 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 4 0.0
1987 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 7 0.0
1988 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 4 0.0
1989 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 6 0.0
1990 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 4 0.0
1991 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 5 0.0
1992 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 7 0.0
1993 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 4 0.0
1994 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 3 0.0
1995 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 1 0.0
1996 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 2 0.0
1997 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 3 0.0
1998 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 2 0.0
1999 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 4 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 245 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 5% of the irrigation seasons in 1974-1999 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.