← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

LOBA DITCH NO 4

Structure dossier · WDID 6300537 · 1 · WEST CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:45 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1884-12-314th most senior of the 533 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LOBA DITCH NO 3 (1884-12-31). Immediately behind: BLUE CREEK DITCH (1887-01-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12784.01884-12-311890-02-07 0.180.0 CIRR 4

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 17 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2022, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 55 11th lowest of 12 · 324% of median 106 0.5
2012 0 1st lowest of 12 · 0% of median 8 0.0
2013 62 12th lowest of 12 · 365% of median 68 0.5
2014 0 1st lowest of 12 · 0% of median 16 0.0
2015 0 1st lowest of 12 · 0% of median 7 0.0
2016 38 10th lowest of 12 · 224% of median 121 0.3
2017 0 1st lowest of 12 · 0% of median 4 0.0
2018 8 6th lowest of 12 · 47% of median 68 0.1
2019 31 9th lowest of 12 · 182% of median 46 1.0
2020 26 7th lowest of 12 · 153% of median 140 0.2
2021 27 8th lowest of 12 · 159% of median 133 0.3
2022 0 1st lowest of 12 · 0% of median 16 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 733 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 30% of the irrigation seasons in 2011-2022 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.