← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

PATTERSON DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 6300550 · 1 · NORTH FORK MESA CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:07 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1915-03-01222nd most senior of the 533 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WILD ROSE DITCH (1913-03-15). Immediately behind: CALAMITY DITCH (1916-06-10).

Decreed rights (3)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
30079.2381915-03-011939-02-11 2.50.0 CIRR 73
30079.238091915-03-101939-02-11 2.240.0 CIRR 74
32547.01939-02-101939-02-11 6.380.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 243 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 265 AF — 109% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 655 15th lowest of 15 · 270% of median 187 5.4
2012 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2013 226 6th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 75 2.4
2014 297 11th lowest of 15 · 122% of median 105 2.7
2015 180 4th lowest of 15 · 74% of median 113 1.8
2016 296 10th lowest of 15 · 122% of median 74 4.0
2017 592 14th lowest of 15 · 244% of median 191 2.8
2018 159 3rd lowest of 15 · 65% of median 49 1.8
2019 514 13th lowest of 15 · 212% of median 111 3.5
2020 243 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 82 2.3
2021 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2022 231 7th lowest of 15 · 95% of median 82 3.0
2023 193 5th lowest of 15 · 79% of median 74 1.6
2024 413 12th lowest of 15 · 170% of median 151 2.0
2025 265 9th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 86 2.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.