Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
ROSEBUD SPRING PIPELINE
Structure dossier · WDID 6300680 · 4 · SALT CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:16 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1920-06-01 — 306th most senior of the 533 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BLACK SPRING PIPELINE (1920-06-01). Immediately behind: INCE WELLS NO 2 & 3 (1978-11-20).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47116.25719 | 1920-06-01 | 1979-12-31 | 0.045 | 0.0 | C | STK |
Recorded use (last 7 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 0 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2021, came in at 0 AF — —% of that, and 1st lowest of the 7 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 13 | 7th lowest of 7 · —% of median | 162 | 0.1 |
| 2013 | 0 | 1st lowest of 7 · —% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2014 | 1 | 6th lowest of 7 · —% of median | 53 | 0.0 |
| 2015 | 0 | 1st lowest of 7 · —% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2016 | 0 | 1st lowest of 7 · —% of median | 4 | 0.0 |
| 2017 | 0 | 1st lowest of 7 · —% of median | 4 | 0.0 |
| 2021 | 0 | 1st lowest of 7 · —% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.