Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
DINSDALE BROS RCHRG WL 2-50036
Structure dossier · WDID 6406727 · 2 · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 00:23 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1998-04-28 — 1755th most senior of the 2052 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: DINSDALE FISHING POND 49994-F (1998-01-15). Immediately behind: COLUMBINE ACRES L7 B1 2ND F WELL (2000-10-09).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55152.54174 | 1998-04-28 | 2001-12-31 | 1744.0 | 256.0 | A | AUGRCH | |
| 55152.54174 | 1998-04-28 | 2001-12-31 | 3.2306 | 0.0 | C | AUGRCH |
Legal record & documents
5 decreed actions on record across
3 court cases:
19CW3099, 12CW0241, 01CW0061.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
19CW3099 | 1 | 2001-12-31 | S |
12CW0241 | 1 | 2001-12-31 | S |
01CW0061 | 3 | 2001-12-31 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 794 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 892 AF — 112% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 319 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 40% of median | 53 | 5.8 |
| 2011 | 775 | 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median | 145 | 3.6 |
| 2012 | 794 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 145 | 4.5 |
| 2013 | 664 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 120 | 3.0 |
| 2014 | 1,255 | 13th lowest of 15 · 158% of median | 221 | 3.2 |
| 2015 | 710 | 5th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | 121 | 3.1 |
| 2016 | 108 | 1st lowest of 15 · 14% of median | 31 | 1.8 |
| 2017 | 1,277 | 14th lowest of 15 · 161% of median | 225 | 3.3 |
| 2018 | 1,246 | 12th lowest of 15 · 157% of median | 222 | 3.3 |
| 2019 | 1,373 | 15th lowest of 15 · 173% of median | 242 | 3.1 |
| 2020 | 759 | 6th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | 155 | 3.1 |
| 2021 | 988 | 11th lowest of 15 · 124% of median | 183 | 2.9 |
| 2022 | 707 | 4th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | 150 | 3.2 |
| 2023 | 862 | 9th lowest of 15 · 109% of median | 180 | 2.7 |
| 2024 | 892 | 10th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 166 | 3.2 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 2 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 2462 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | patchy | 66% of the irrigation seasons in 2007-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.