← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

HELIOTROPE DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 7200686 · 1 · MIDDLETON CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:09 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1914-07-15370th most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: JENKINS CROSS PHILLIPS 2 (1914-06-16). Immediately behind: V P BYRAM DITCH NO 1 (1914-07-27).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
30895.235711914-07-151941-07-25 0.390.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 30 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2019, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1994 32 7th lowest of 12 · 108% of median 22 1.0
1995 7 2nd lowest of 12 · 24% of median 10 0.4
1997 115 12th lowest of 12 · 390% of median 145 0.5
1998 100 10th lowest of 12 · 339% of median 143 0.5
1999 86 9th lowest of 12 · 292% of median 139 0.4
2000 50 8th lowest of 12 · 170% of median 69 0.4
2001 114 11th lowest of 12 · 386% of median 59 1.5
2004 13 4th lowest of 12 · 44% of median 31 0.2
2005 10 3rd lowest of 12 · 34% of median 4 1.8
2006 14 5th lowest of 12 · 48% of median 8 1.0
2007 27 6th lowest of 12 · 92% of median 43 0.5
2019 0 1st lowest of 12 · 0% of median 1 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 674 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 12% of the irrigation seasons in 1994-2019 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.