Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
R M G DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 7200852 · 1 · BIG CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:06 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1894-11-01 — 172nd most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: KIGGINS GOYN DITCH (1894-11-01). Immediately behind: MESA CREEK RES NO 2 (1896-12-22).
Decreed rights (3)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22729.16376 | 1894-11-01 | 1912-07-22 | 7.57 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 30895.27927 | 1926-06-18 | 1941-07-25 | 4.68 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 34419.27514 | 1925-05-01 | 1959-07-21 | 3.54 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Legal record & documents
8 decreed actions on record across
6 court cases:
CA8303, W0828, CA5812, 84CW0218, CA9529, CA1927.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA8303 | 1 | 1959-07-21 | S |
W0828 | 1 | 1941-07-25 | S |
CA5812 | 3 | 1941-07-25 | S |
84CW0218 | 1 | 1941-07-25 | S |
CA9529 | 1 | 1912-07-22 | S |
CA1927 | 1 | 1912-07-22 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 477 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 477 AF — 100% of that, and 8th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 524 | 10th lowest of 15 · 110% of median | 35 | 9.8 |
| 2011 | 665 | 14th lowest of 15 · 139% of median | 53 | 9.5 |
| 2012 | 200 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 42% of median | 184 | 3.5 |
| 2013 | 387 | 6th lowest of 15 · 81% of median | 27 | 13.0 |
| 2014 | 509 | 9th lowest of 15 · 107% of median | 42 | 11.3 |
| 2015 | 565 | 12th lowest of 15 · 118% of median | 89 | 7.8 |
| 2016 | 426 | 7th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | 48 | 13.5 |
| 2017 | 544 | 11th lowest of 15 · 114% of median | 46 | 10.6 |
| 2018 | 245 | 5th lowest of 15 · 51% of median | 56 | 7.5 |
| 2019 | 640 | 13th lowest of 15 · 134% of median | 79 | 15.2 |
| 2020 | 222 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 46% of median | 105 | 7.5 |
| 2021 | 183 | 1st lowest of 15 · 38% of median | 154 | 2.0 |
| 2022 | 225 | 4th lowest of 15 · 47% of median | 106 | 7.6 |
| 2023 | 678 | 15th lowest of 15 · 142% of median | 111 | 7.2 |
| 2024 | 477 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 93 | 8.2 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 3 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 2843 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 24% of the irrigation seasons in 1970-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.