Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
DESIDERIO MARTINEZ DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 7800534 · 1 · STOLLSTEIMER CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:23 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1917-05-15 — 96th most senior of the 366 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: JOHN R STEVENS DITCH (1916-05-17). Immediately behind: G S HATCHER DITCH (1917-10-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24606.0 | 1917-05-15 | 1928-06-05 | 0.25 | 0.0 | C | IRR | #214 |
Legal record & documents
3 decreed actions on record across
2 court cases:
CA0308, 37/92/301.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA0308 | 2 | 1928-06-05 | S |
37/92/301 | 1 | 1928-06-05 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 17 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2006, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1984 | 73 | 13th lowest of 15 · 429% of median | 38 | 1.0 |
| 1986 | 224 | 14th lowest of 15 · 1318% of median | 96 | 2.0 |
| 1987 | 682 | 15th lowest of 15 · 4012% of median | 97 | 6.1 |
| 1991 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 1992 | 17 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 22 | 0.5 |
| 1994 | 50 | 12th lowest of 15 · 294% of median | 126 | 0.2 |
| 1996 | 13 | 7th lowest of 15 · 76% of median | 38 | 0.2 |
| 1997 | 21 | 10th lowest of 15 · 124% of median | 42 | 0.5 |
| 1998 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 16 | 0.0 |
| 1999 | 48 | 11th lowest of 15 · 282% of median | 155 | 0.2 |
| 2000 | 12 | 5th lowest of 15 · 71% of median | 88 | 0.1 |
| 2001 | 12 | 5th lowest of 15 · 71% of median | 52 | 0.2 |
| 2002 | 7 | 4th lowest of 15 · 41% of median | 56 | 0.1 |
| 2003 | 19 | 9th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 72 | 0.2 |
| 2006 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 7 | 0.0 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use is falling over its last 15 recorded years (-3 AF/yr, Mann-Kendall p=0.029).
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 1284 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 21% of the irrigation seasons in 1978-2006 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.