Bootstrap review report — d7_wd78_piedra_river_basin
Generated 2026-08-18 09:01 UTC for Division 7 / Water District 78.
This is a review checklist, not a finished config. Everything below is a suggestion from live DWR data — confirm or correct each section in config.yaml before running this basin for real.
1. Stream-name patterns
Assumed mainstem pattern: STOLLSTEIMER CREEK (highest-count waterSource value). Candidates below by structure count — decide which are real tributaries worth their own centerline vs. noise, and add them to longitudinal.tributary_stream_patterns in priority order (more-specific names, e.g. "WEST FORK X", must precede substrings of themselves, e.g. "X").
| waterSource | structure count |
|---|---|
| STOLLSTEIMER CREEK (assumed mainstem) | 48 |
| PIEDRA RIVER | 36 |
| DEVIL CREEK | 18 |
| YELLOWJACKET CREEK | 16 |
| WEMINUCHE CREEK | 14 |
| EAST FORK PIEDRA RIVER | 12 |
| DUTTON CREEK | 10 |
| PLUMTAW CREEK | 9 |
| MIDDLE FORK PIEDRA RIVER | 9 |
| PAGOSA CREEK | 7 |
| SQUAW CREEK | 6 |
| WILLIAMS CREEK | 5 |
| TRANSBASIN WATER | 3 |
2. Diversion / return classification
Auto-classified from structureType + name patterns: 173 diversions, 14 returns, 22 unclassified (neither pattern matched — these render as neither on the schematic unless added to return_flow_wdids/force_diversion_wdids or a type is added to the diversion/return type lists).
This layer needs the least manual work — it's the same heuristic the engine uses at runtime. Spot-check a sample rather than reviewing every row; if you have a water-year accounting spreadsheet for this basin, cross-reference it against the 'other' bucket specifically (that's where a real augmentation return with an unusual DWR structureType will hide).
2b. Cross-checked against decreed water rights (CDSS)
13 structure(s) have a decreed water right (CDSS waterrights/netamount) that disagrees with the structureType/name-pattern classification above. Same-agency evidence (DWR/HydroBase), not independent of DWR the way the NLDI topology check is — worth a glance, not an automatic correction.
| wdid | structure | currently | decreed uses suggest | decreed uses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7803822 | ALAN'S LAKE/WELL | other | diversion | Commercial, Fishery, Recreation, Stock |
| 7805003 | DEVIL CREEK WELL NO 1 | other | diversion | Domestic |
| 7805004 | DEVIL CREEK WELL NO 2 | other | diversion | Domestic |
| 7805007 | SUSAN B KERR WELL NO 1 | other | diversion | Domestic, Irrigation |
| 7805017 | JOHN TAYLOR WELL #1 | other | diversion | Commercial |
| 7805022 | JOHN TAYLOR WELL #2 | other | diversion | Commercial, Domestic, Irrigation, Recreation |
| 7805036 | WELCH CABIN WELL-POND | other | diversion | Commercial, Domestic, Fishery, Irrigation, Stock, Storage, Wildlife |
| 7805037 | PARELLI WELL | other | diversion | Commercial, Domestic, Fire, Irrigation, Stock |
| 7805038 | PIEDRA PARK WELL NO. 1 | other | diversion | Municipal |
| 7805039 | PIEDRA PARK WELL NO. 2 | other | diversion | Municipal |
| 7805042 | BARB'S WELL | other | diversion | Commercial, Domestic, Fire, Irrigation, Stock |
| 7805043 | ELK SPRING POND/WELL | other | diversion | Evaporative, Fishery, Stock, Wildlife |
| 7805044 | BUTTERCUP WELL | other | diversion | Commercial |
3. Suspected nested tributaries
8 flag(s) confirmed connected by USGS NLDI — real surveyed stream-network topology, not a distance guess (see VERIFICATION-PLAN.md). This confirms the two candidates' channels really do merge (ruling out a coincidental-proximity false flag) but NOT auto-applied to tributary_parent_overrides — NLDI's overlap test can't reliably tell which side is upstream once two streams have already merged near DWR's own recorded structures, only that they connect. Confirm the direction (which one is the tributary, which is the parent) from local knowledge or the evidence below, then set it yourself.
| pair | NLDI evidence |
|---|---|
| YELLOWJACKET CREEK <-> PIEDRA RIVER | tributary's downstream NHD trace (comid 17030952) first overlaps PIEDRA RIVER's own downstream trace at index 1 (next-nearest candidate: ('MAINSTEM', 5)) |
| PIEDRA RIVER <-> PAGOSA CREEK | tributary's downstream NHD trace (comid 17030766) first overlaps PAGOSA CREEK's own downstream trace at index 0 (next-nearest candidate: none) |
| WEMINUCHE CREEK <-> WILLIAMS CREEK | tributary's downstream NHD trace (comid 17031218) first overlaps WILLIAMS CREEK's own downstream trace at index 2 (next-nearest candidate: none) |
| PAGOSA CREEK <-> PIEDRA RIVER | tributary's downstream NHD trace (comid 17030762) first overlaps PIEDRA RIVER's own downstream trace at index 1 (next-nearest candidate: none) |
| PLUMTAW CREEK <-> PIEDRA RIVER | tributary's downstream NHD trace (comid 17030768) first overlaps PIEDRA RIVER's own downstream trace at index 1 (next-nearest candidate: none) |
| WILLIAMS CREEK <-> PIEDRA RIVER | tributary's downstream NHD trace (comid 17030744) first overlaps PIEDRA RIVER's own downstream trace at index 2 (next-nearest candidate: none) |
| DEVIL CREEK <-> PIEDRA RIVER | tributary's downstream NHD trace (comid 17030974) first overlaps PIEDRA RIVER's own downstream trace at index 1 (next-nearest candidate: ('MAINSTEM', 4)) |
| SQUAW CREEK <-> YELLOWJACKET CREEK | tributary's downstream NHD trace (comid 17030946) first overlaps YELLOWJACKET CREEK's own downstream trace at index 1 (next-nearest candidate: ('MAINSTEM', 7)) |
4. Gage placement risk
None — every gage with a resolvable position is within the placement cutoff.
10 more gage(s) pass but are within 2x the cutoff distance — worth a glance if the structure dataset changes later.
Next steps
- Fill in
tributary_stream_patternsfrom section 1. - Resolve section 3's flags (or confirm none apply).
- Resolve section 4's at-risk gages.
- Cross-reference
return_flow_wdids/force_diversion_wdidsagainst any local accounting source you have for this basin. - Review the rendered schematic for this district before relying on it.
Evolution of the network
Computed 2026-08-20 09:42 from 10 gage(s) with cached period-of-record data. Statistical tests (Mann-Kendall trend, Pettitt changepoint) require at least 8 years spanning at least 10 years of record -- gages below that report no signal, not "no change."
Data provenance & quality
Where these numbers come from and how far they can be trusted. Grade C (3/6 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (imported 2026-08-19) for history, plus the CDSS REST API for current conditions.
| Check | State | What was measured |
|---|---|---|
| gage freshness | stale | newest gage reading is 45 day(s) old (target 7) |
| diversion record | expected-lag | newest diversion record is 293 day(s) old (DWR publishes ~1 year in arrears) |
| structure coverage | sparse | 14% of schematic structures have data |
Independent check: PASS — 100.0000% agreement across 154,523 stored values re-checked against DWR's authoritative record (HydroBase_CO_20260707), over 20 structures. 0 disagreement(s) beyond a 0.01 cfs tolerance. Checked 2026-08-19; a rotating sample covers the whole basin across successive runs, and the structures this report cites are checked every time.
Federal cross-check: PASS — 99.52% day-level agreement with USGS's own published records for the same gages, across 7 co-listed station(s) and 50,101 overlapping days (within max(2%, 0.5 cfs) daily). Pre-1950 records at some gages carry known between-agency day-stamp and transcription differences — scored at each year's best ±1-day alignment; residual disagreement is real historical divergence, flagged for review.
10 gage(s) / 60,439 daily values (1936-10-01–2026-07-06); 170 structure(s) with diversion records; 366 with decreed rights. Methodology has not yet had independent expert review — treat every figure as an advisory screen, not an administrative or legal conclusion.
Read this first: the measurement network itself evolved
This basin was not always measured the way it is today — the API-era record is dense and recent, the early record sparse. 2 gage(s) and 58 structure(s) report in 2026, but structure reporting only reached half its modern level around ~1974. Every historical claim below is checked against this: long-term shifts that co-move with the growth of the network carry an explicit measurement-evolution caution, and abandonment screens whose idleness begins before the modern reporting era are flagged †.
| Decade | Gages with data (median yr) | Structures reporting (median yr) |
|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 3 | 0 |
| 1940s | 4 | 0 |
| 1950s | 2 | 0 |
| 1960s | 2 | 32 |
| 1970s | 2 | 67 |
| 1980s | 1 | 86 |
| 1990s | 2 | 88 |
| 2000s | 2 | 94 |
| 2010s | 2 | 62 |
| 2020s | 2 | 58 |
Gage flow trend & changepoints
Every located gage with a period of record — dot size scales with the strength of its flow trend (|Sen slope| in %/decade, the same statistic as the table below), color with direction. An amber ring marks a detected Pettitt changepoint. Click a gage to chart its trend and shift.
| Gage | Trend | Change / decade | Significance | Years | Changepoint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
▸
PIEDRA RIVER NEAR ARBOLES, CO. PIEARBCO |
↓ decreasing | -10.5% | p=0.033 | 63 | ~1999 |
9 other gage(s) show no significant trend or changepoint (not shown).
Mass-balance (network closure) trend
Structure divrec-history backfill coverage as of the last check: 14% of 135 schematic-relevant structures. 0 year(s) clear the 30% coverage gate so far -- the trend activates automatically once qualifying years span a full decade. No action needed; the nightly backfill keeps extending the record.
Reach gain/loss shifts (–)
Mass-balance kinks computed for every summer month back to (0 reach-snapshots) — which reaches gain or lose water, and how that has shifted across decades. Each shift is cross-checked against the observation record above: as more diversions became metered, "unaccounted" water shrinks mechanically, which can masquerade as a hydrologic shift.
No reach shows a statistically significant long-term gain/loss shift.
Groundwater now has its own tab: 44 monitored well(s), water-table trends, stream corridors, and the advisory depletion screen.
Reservoirs now has its own tab: 28 reservoir(s), end-of-year storage back to 1970, click-to-chart histories.
Cross-gage pattern fingerprint
Not enough gages with a long enough common-coverage window yet to fingerprint shared patterns.
The basin's aquifer story, from 243 water-level measurements across 44 monitored well(s) (33 alluvial, 0 bedrock, rest unclassified) — plus 2 administered well(s) reporting metered pumping through diversion records. Observation wells and pumping wells are different populations and are never conflated. Click a well to chart its record.
Well map
Every monitored well with a location — hover for identity, click to chart its water-level record below. ● alluvial ● bedrock / confined (Denver Basin, High Plains, etc. — one-way, no human-timescale recharge) ● unclassified — marker size scales with the strength of the well's water-level trend (|Sen slope| in ft/decade — the same Mann-Kendall/Sen statistic as the trends table below); the smallest, faintest dots have too little record to test.
3D aquifer x-ray
Every aquifer unit as its own 3D head surface — alluvial water table on top, Denver Basin members (Dawson, Denver, Arapahoe, Laramie–Fox Hills) stacked beneath where measured — interpolated from measured water levels and animated through time. Units are never mixed; surfaces exist only inside each unit's well coverage (no extrapolation); thin epochs are suppressed with their reason shown. Vertical scale exaggerated for readability; z is head elevation in feet. Advisory — measured heads, not a calibrated model.
Water-table trends
Of 1 well(s) with enough record for a trend test: 1 declining, 0 rising.
| Fastest-declining wells | Setting | ft / decade | Span | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ WS-25 | alluvial | -0.53 | 42 yr | 0.0043 |
Wells labeled by administrative world before anything else is said about them: tributary alluvium participates in the priority system; designated-basin and Denver Basin bedrock aquifers are governed differently and are excluded from stream-connection reasoning. Read bedrock declines differently too: deep bedrock aquifers recharge negligibly on human timescales, so a falling bedrock level is storage mining — effectively permanent — not a drought response that a wet year undoes. All screens advisory.
28 reservoir(s) with 5,424 storage measurement(s), 1970–2024. Basin storage as of 2023-10-31 (the record's own end — reservoir records publish ~annually): 14,465 AF across 8 reservoir(s). Storage change is real water the mass balance must credit — a losing reach beside a filling reservoir isn't losing water, it's banking it.
Reservoir map — how full is each vessel?
Each reservoir drawn as a vessel: bubble size ∝ its record-high storage, fill level = last recorded storage as a share of its surveyed capacity (USACE National Inventory of Dams) where a confident NID match exists — the tooltip names the matched dam — and of its own record high otherwise (a wrong capacity would be worse than an honest record high, so only confident joins upgrade). Hover for numbers, click to chart its history below the map. A dashed teal ring marks reservoirs reporting live DWR telemetry — their fill reflects yesterday's storage, drawn as a dotted tail on charts and treated as provisional until the next verified HydroBase snapshot supersedes it. ● <25% ● 25–60% ● 60–90% ● >90%
Basin storage, end of each water year
End-of-water-year totals; per-year reservoir counts shown because reporting coverage varies -- a total is only comparable to years with similar counts.
Largest reservoirs on record
Click a reservoir to chart its full storage history.
| Reservoir | Last recorded storage (AF) | As of |
|---|---|---|
| ▸ WILLIAMS CREEK RESERVOIR (7803642) | 8,482 | 2023-10-31 |
| ▸ STEVENS RESERVOIR DAM (7803645) | 1,825 | 2022-10-31 |
| ▸ G S HATCHER RESERVOIR (7803626) | 1,635 | 2022-10-31 |
| ▸ LINN AND CLARK RESERVOIR (7803629) | 1,239 | 2022-10-31 |
| ▸ TOWN CENTER LAKE (7803646) | 641 | 2022-10-31 |
| ▸ LAKE FOREST (7803644) | 452 | 2022-10-31 |
| ▸ PARGIN RESERVOIR (7803633) | 337 | 2011-10-31 |
| ▸ PINON LAKE (7803636) | 125 | 2022-10-31 |
Decrees, seniority, and administrative calls connected to this basin's flow network. Advisory reading aids on public DWR data — not administrative or legal conclusions. Rights on file: 435 across 366 structure(s); 30 structure(s) carry 0 court-case references.
Abandonment radar (25 screens)
Absolute rights with 10+ years of no recorded diversions. Screens only — storage, alternate points, and plan operations can explain nonuse lawfully. And diversion REPORTING itself only reached its modern level ~1974 — idleness that begins before then may be unreported use, not nonuse (flagged † below).
- STEVENS SPRING (7800735) (1999-04-10, 0.0 cfs decreed): last active 1968 — 57 years idle † predates modern reporting era — last recorded activity predates this basin's modern reporting era (~1974) -- early absence of record is weak evidence of nonuse
- BUCY WATER LINE (7800514) (1963-07-07, 0.0 cfs decreed): last active 1970 — 55 years idle † predates modern reporting era — last recorded activity predates this basin's modern reporting era (~1974) -- early absence of record is weak evidence of nonuse
- HERSCH DITCH (7800561) (1949-08-01, 8.0 cfs decreed): last active 1970 — 55 years idle † predates modern reporting era — last recorded activity predates this basin's modern reporting era (~1974) -- early absence of record is weak evidence of nonuse
- MARTIN SPG D AND PL NO 1 (7800581) (1928-07-15, 1.0 cfs decreed): last active 1974 — 51 years idle
- PIEDRA STATION PIPE LINE (7800606) (1913-10-01, 0.1 cfs decreed): last active 1974 — 51 years idle
- SANDFORD WATERLINE (7800615) (1968-09-01, 0.0 cfs decreed): last active 1974 — 51 years idle
- YELLOW JACKET PIPE LINE (7800651) (1912-06-10, 0.1 cfs decreed): last active 1974 — 51 years idle
- LINN AND CLARK RESERVOIR (7803629) (1902-06-14, 0.0 cfs decreed): last active 1974 — 51 years idle
- J B MARTINEZ DITCH (7800564) (1883-06-14, 1.2 cfs decreed): last active 1975 — 50 years idle
- TRES PIEDRAS DITCH (7800639) (1943-10-01, 2.0 cfs decreed): last active 1975 — 50 years idle
Compliance screens (85 advisory flags)
Screened 118 of 366 structures with rights (139 have diversion history on file). A flag is a lead for expert review — augmentation plans, exchanges, and free-river conditions can make over-decree diversions lawful and are deliberately not modeled.
- PIEDRA FALLS DITCH (7800604): Observed p99 daily rate 26.1 cfs (max 33.0) exceeds total decreed absolute 26.0 cfs across 25808 recorded day(s).
- GORDON CREEK WETLANDS DIVERSION DITCH (7800756): Observed p99 daily rate 20.0 cfs (max 20.0) exceeds total decreed absolute 4.0 cfs across 1681 recorded day(s).
- FARROW AND PETERSON D (7800545): Observed p99 daily rate 18.4 cfs (max 23.3) exceeds total decreed absolute 16.6 cfs across 26551 recorded day(s).
- J B MARTINEZ DITCH (7800564): Observed p99 daily rate 17.0 cfs (max 20.0) exceeds total decreed absolute 1.2 cfs across 322 recorded day(s).
- CIMARRON DITCH (7800524): Observed p99 daily rate 15.0 cfs (max 15.0) exceeds total decreed absolute 5.0 cfs across 7748 recorded day(s).
- G S HATCHER DITCH (7800550): Observed p99 daily rate 15.0 cfs (max 16.8) exceeds total decreed absolute 7.5 cfs across 1550 recorded day(s).
- M E AND M DITCH (7800580): Observed p99 daily rate 14.4 cfs (max 21.0) exceeds total decreed absolute 12.0 cfs across 15526 recorded day(s).
- CLAYTON-REED DITCH (7800525): Observed p99 daily rate 13.0 cfs (max 13.1) exceeds total decreed absolute 10.0 cfs across 19001 recorded day(s).
- HOSSACK CREEK DITCH (7800562): Observed p99 daily rate 13.0 cfs (max 24.7) exceeds total decreed absolute 10.0 cfs across 10971 recorded day(s).
- J C R DITCH (7800565): Observed p99 daily rate 12.9 cfs (max 19.0) exceeds total decreed absolute 10.0 cfs across 6994 recorded day(s).
Seniority (top structures by decreed rate)
| Structure | Senior priority date | Rights | Decreed abs (cfs) | Decreed abs (AF) | Conditional? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIEDRA RIVER MIN FLOW (7801903) | 1978-03-16 | 1 | 70.0 | 0 | — |
| PIEDRA RIVER MIN FLOW (7801910) | 1979-03-14 | 1 | 70.0 | 0 | — |
| PIEDRA RIVER MIN FLOW (7801902) | 1978-03-16 | 1 | 53.0 | 0 | — |
| PIEDRA RIVER MIN FLOW (7801901) | 1978-03-16 | 1 | 44.0 | 0 | — |
| LINN AND CLARK DITCH (7800578) | 1902-06-14 | 1 | 36.5 | 0 | — |
| PIEDRA RIVER MIN FLOW (7801900) | 1978-03-16 | 1 | 30.0 | 0 | — |
| PIEDRA FALLS DITCH (7800604) | 1934-07-18 | 2 | 26.0 | 0 | yes |
| LITTLE PAGOSA CREEK DIVR (7800659) | 1939-12-31 | 1 | 26.0 | 0 | — |
| BARNES-MEUSER AND SHAW D (7800507) | 1903-12-31 | 3 | 22.5 | 0 | — |
| BUCKSKIN-NAILOR DITCH (7800513) | 1900-03-20 | 7 | 21.9 | 0 | — |
| PERKINS DITCH - STOLLSTEIMER CREEK (7800600) | 1963-07-28 | 1 | 20.0 | 0 | — |
| ABRAHAM DAVIS DITCH (7800501) | 1900-04-01 | 4 | 18.0 | 0 | — |
| WEMINUCHE CR MIN FLOW (7801909) | 1978-03-16 | 1 | 18.0 | 0 | — |
| FARROW AND PETERSON D (7800545) | 1879-04-10 | 6 | 16.6 | 0 | — |
| F S MOCKLER IRR DITCH (7800544) | 1901-10-01 | 1 | 15.0 | 0 | — |
No inventory or legal-document changes detected since the daily watch began.
If a call were placed at a given seniority, which structures in this basin would be out of priority, and how much of their decreed rate would be curtailed? Computed from this basin's cached decrees.
What this does and doesn't model. Seniority arithmetic only: every right junior to the call is treated as curtailed. It does not model reach applicability — structures downstream of the calling point are not administered by it — and it applies no futile-call judgment. Read it as “who is junior to this date, and by how much,” not as a prediction of what the Division Engineer would actually order.
Pick a calling right
Real decrees from this basin, ordered by administration number — that is, by actual seniority. The years will look out of order, and that is correct: an administration number encodes the adjudication date as well as the appropriation date, so a right appropriated in 1970 can be administered ahead of one from 1950. A senior call curtails almost everything; a junior one curtails almost nothing.
Or enter an administration number directly
DWR administration numbers encode appropriation and adjudication dates; lower is more senior.