← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BULL CANAL RES NO 8

Structure dossier · WDID 0203351 · RESERVOIR · BIG DRY CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:42 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (0576005) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Current administration

● Fully called out — call at LOWER LATHAM DITCH (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1877-11-14).

● Fully called out — call at WESTERN MUTUAL DITCH (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1871-08-09).

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1976-05-067504th most senior of the 21881 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 2305451 (1976-04-26). Immediately behind: 0205088 (1976-05-06).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
46147.01976-05-061976-12-31 684.27548.2 AIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMSTKOTH
53482.01996-06-051996-12-31 761.370.0 AMUN

Recorded use (last 13 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,707 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 2,284 AF — 134% of that, and 6th lowest of the 7 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2012 no recorded volume 3,185 0
2013 no recorded volume 3,014 0
2014 no recorded volume 2,681 0
2015 no recorded volume 3,381 0
2016 no recorded volume 2,291 0
2017 no recorded volume 2,173 0
2018 156 1st lowest of 7 · 9% of median 374 35 2.8
2019 2,416 7th lowest of 7 · 142% of median 1,085 365 5.5
2020 2,040 5th lowest of 7 · 120% of median 1,600 366 5.5
2021 1,707 4th lowest of 7 · 100% of median 1,417 365 6.8
2022 518 3rd lowest of 7 · 30% of median 1,044 261 4.7
2023 329 2nd lowest of 7 · 19% of median 186 365 6.6
2024 2,284 6th lowest of 7 · 134% of median 886 305 6.7

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 2 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2062 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 26% of the irrigation seasons in 1987-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.