Hydrohistorian
Log in

← My Water  ·  All reservoirs in this district  ·  Print / save as PDF  · 

 ·  every download of this record carries its certificate id

CIVIC CENTER LAKE

Structure dossier · WDID 0203396 · RESERVOIR · CLEAR CREEK · DWR record · probably THORNTON CITY OF’s (matched on DWR’s contact or an EPA intake name; verify below)

Civic Center Lake is a reservoir on Clear Creek in Colorado. This page is its public record: the water it has a right to, whether it may take it today, and its history, compiled from the Colorado Division of Water Resources.

Source DWR administrative record · verify at DWR structure ↗ Source DWR administrative record · verify at DWR diversion records ↗ Source Our computation, scored against a reference · scored against DWR's call analysis, see /methods

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-10-15 05:29 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260928 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (dd58e60) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

The record and the river

In short

CIVIC CENTER LAKE holds 8 decreed rights on CLEAR CREEK. No active call senior to its rights reaches its district today (18 active calls checked), so it is in priority now. 9 further calls state no district and sit outside this one, so they are counted here rather than assumed either way. That is today's position; the weeks ahead cannot be projected for it: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it. In a median year over its last 10 recorded years it diverts 16 acre-feet. It was a party to 3 court cases that also touched 6 other structures.

Assembled from the figures on this page — every number above is checked against them before it is shown (7 checked). The detail, with its method, is in the cards below.

Download this structure

Everything on this page as data you can work with — and a README that makes it citable: the HydroBase snapshot it was built from, the build commit, what every column means, the method behind each derived figure, and that method's stated limits.

⇩ Full record (.zip) Print / save as PDF

Or one table at a time: rights.csv · annual_use.csv · curtailment_now.csv · court_cases.csv · co_parties.csv · call_climatology.csv

What is in the bundle
  • rights.csv — every decreed right, most senior first, with admin numbers, dates, amounts, uses and case numbers.
  • annual_use.csv — recorded diversion by year, with releases accounted separately.
  • curtailment_now.csv — each right's current priority status and how often it was out across analog years.
  • court_cases.csv — the cases attached to its rights.
  • co_parties.csv — the other structures that were parties to those cases. Not available anywhere else.
  • call_climatology.csv — how often each right has been out of priority by week of season, with confidence intervals and the seasons the record could actually judge.
  • README.txt — provenance, methods, limits, disclaimer, and links back to DWR's own records for verification.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it (storage). Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Current administration

● In priority — no active call senior to this structure's rights affects its district (18 active call(s) checked).

9 further calls state no district and sit outside this one, so they are counted here rather than assumed either way.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

The outlook for the weeks ahead is not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it. Today’s position is a separate question, and it is answered in Current administration above — that screen reads the district’s active calls and needs no reference gage.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1887-10-01 — 868th most senior of the 21886 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: EASTLAKE RES 3 (1887-09-01). Immediately behind: 0203994 (1888-01-01).

Decreed rights (8)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. Alt-pointAn absolute amount decreed at another structure that may be diverted here instead -- an alternate point of diversion or an exchange. DWR calls this the APEX amount; a right showing 0.0 absolute but an alt-point amount is exercised here under another structure's decree. Decreed forWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
16718.13788 1887-10-011936-05-13 0.0 AF 0.0 260.0 AF All beneficial uses 90CW0228
16718.14245 1888-12-311936-05-13 1137.0 AF 0.0 — Irrigation, Domestic 90CW0228, CA60052
16718.14519 1889-10-011936-05-13 0.0 AF 0.0 121.4 AF Irrigation, All beneficial uses 90CW0228
16718.15310 1891-12-011936-05-13 0.0 AF 0.0 30.0 AF All beneficial uses 91CW0070
19722.00000 1903-12-311936-05-13 0.0 AF 0.0 57.33 AF All beneficial uses 91CW0070
51216.00000 1990-03-231990-12-31 0.0 AF 213.0 AF — Irrigation, Municipal +8 90CW0230
57821.00000 2008-04-222008-12-31 0.0 AF 0.0 111.6 AF Municipal, Augmentation 08CW0082
57821.00000 2008-04-222008-12-31 0.0 cfs 0.0 18.8 cfs Municipal, Augmentation 08CW0082

Amounts marked cfs are flow rates; AF are stored volumes (storage rights are decreed in acre-feet). An absolute amount of 0.0 beside an alt-point amount is not a dead right: the water is decreed at another structure, and that row records permission to divert it here instead (an alternate point or exchange). A case listing several numbers reflects the original decree plus later change cases.

How often is it out of priority?

Across the 11 seasons whose call record is complete enough to judge this structure (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026), week by week from April.

most senior right · admin 16718.13788 · peaks at 10 of 11 seasons
AprMayJunJulAugSep
middle right · admin 16718.15310 · peaks at 10 of 11 seasons
AprMayJunJulAugSep
most junior right · admin 57821.00000 · peaks at 10 of 11 seasons
AprMayJunJulAugSep
Why only 11 seasons, and what the bars mean

Each bar is one week: how many of those seasons that right was out of priority under a call this site can lawfully attribute to this structure. Green is never, red is every season on record.

The short record is a property of DWR's data, not of the river. A call only counts against a structure when we can establish it applies — by the districts named in its set comments, or by stream mile on the same source. DWR did not begin stating affected districts routinely until about 2015: fewer than one call in ten can be judged before then, against roughly two in three since. A season we cannot judge is not a season without calls, so it is dropped rather than counted as quiet — 12 seasons dropped here.

This is a frequency over past seasons, not a forecast. It says nothing about what the division engineer will do this year.

Recorded use (last 10 years on record)

Years far under the decreed amount? That gap has a name — paper water vs. wet water, explained on this structure.

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 16 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 16 AF — 100% of that, and 5th lowest of the 10 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2016 17 7th lowest of 10 · 106% of median 28 1.3
2017 20 10th lowest of 10 · 125% of median 30 1.5
2018 19 9th lowest of 10 · 119% of median 45 0.8
2019 8 2nd lowest of 10 · 50% of median 12 1.7
2020 18 8th lowest of 10 · 112% of median 29 0.8
2021 14 4th lowest of 10 · 88% of median 16 2.4
2022 16 5th lowest of 10 · 100% of median 75 5.0
2023 3 1st lowest of 10 · 19% of median 365 0.0
2024 8 2nd lowest of 10 · 50% of median 366 1.3
2025 16 5th lowest of 10 · 100% of median 304 1.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 8 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1270 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 18% of the irrigation seasons in 1993-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.

Hydrohistorian is free, with no ads — one server and a lot of public records. If it earns its keep, you can help keep it running.