← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ANDERSON DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 0600501 · DITCH · BOULDER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:43 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (96d5528) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: no administrative call record for this basin.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1860-10-0143rd most senior of the 1867 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WILLIAM C HAKE DITCH (1860-06-01). Immediately behind: GODDING DAILEY PLUMB D (1861-03-01).

On MAINSTEM at river mile 7.9, it is 3rd of 78 down the reach. Immediately upstream: SILVER LAKE DITCH. Immediately downstream: FARMERS DITCH.

Position on the modelled network, not a claim about whose water this is — a stream carries water from many rights at once, and diverted water returns to it.

Decreed rights (5)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
3927.01860-10-011882-06-02 16.35220.0 CSTOIRRAUG
20890.200311904-11-041926-06-21 40.00.0 CSTO
26630.01922-11-291926-06-21 40.00.0 CSTO
29219.01929-12-311953-09-28 40.00.0 CSTO
31379.01935-11-301953-09-28 40.00.0 CSTO

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,840 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 984 AF — 54% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 2,217 11th lowest of 15 · 120% of median 201 10.3
2011 2,560 14th lowest of 15 · 139% of median 259 11.1
2012 3,000 15th lowest of 15 · 163% of median 295 9.9
2013 1,737 7th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 137 10.7
2014 2,011 9th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 167 8.0
2015 1,456 5th lowest of 15 · 79% of median 157 7.6
2016 1,840 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 219 7.8
2017 2,223 12th lowest of 15 · 121% of median 180 11.0
2018 2,026 10th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 193 13.6
2019 1,603 6th lowest of 15 · 87% of median 189 6.9
2020 101 1st lowest of 15 · 6% of median 17 4.6
2022 1,345 4th lowest of 15 · 73% of median 192 8.8
2023 897 2nd lowest of 15 · 49% of median 169 6.6
2024 2,301 13th lowest of 15 · 125% of median 187 446.0
2025 984 3rd lowest of 15 · 54% of median 179 3.8

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (10/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 5 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record current 13536 measured days, newest 285 day(s) before the data's end (DWR publishes ~1 year in arrears)
record continuity continuous 84% of the irrigation seasons in 1950-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.