← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

LEYNER COTTONWOOD DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 0600565 · DITCH · SOUTH BOULDER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:20 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (96d5528) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: no administrative call record for this basin.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1859-10-013rd most senior of the 1867 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: COMMUNITY DITCH (1859-10-01). Immediately behind: DAVIDSON DITCH (1859-10-01).

On SOUTH BOULDER CREEK at river mile 15.2, it is 25th of 58 down the reach. Immediately upstream: MCGINN DITCH. Immediately downstream: ENTERPRISE DITCH.

Position on the modelled network, not a claim about whose water this is — a stream carries water from many rights at once, and diverted water returns to it.

Decreed rights (24)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
3561.01859-10-011882-06-02 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISDOMAUGWLD
4869.01863-05-011882-06-02 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISDOMAUGWLD
5511.01865-02-011882-06-02 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISDOMAUGWLD
5570.01865-04-011882-06-02 25.9080.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISDOMSTKOTHWLD
5935.01866-04-011882-06-02 13.4540.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISDOMSTKOTHWLD
5979.01866-05-151882-06-02 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISDOMAUGWLD
5996.01866-06-011882-06-02 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISDOMAUGWLD
7457.01870-06-011882-06-02 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISDOMAUGWLD
7579.01870-10-011882-06-02 18.2580.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISDOMSTKOTHWLD
8141.01872-04-151882-06-02 0.00.0 CIRRMUNRECFISDOMWLD
8553.01873-06-011882-06-02 0.00.0 CIRRMUNRECFISDOMWLD
11567.01881-09-011907-03-13 0.00.0 CIRRMUNRECFISDOMWLD
12724.01884-11-011907-03-13 0.00.0 CIRRMUNRECFISDOMWLD
15386.01892-02-151907-03-13 0.00.0 CIRRMUNRECFISDOMWLD
17441.01897-10-011907-03-13 0.00.0 CIRRMUNRECFISDOMWLD
20890.206241906-06-201907-11-03 0.00.0 CIRRMUNRECFISDOMWLD
27930.239811915-08-291953-09-28 0.00.0 CIRRMUNRECFISDOMWLD
47847.01980-12-311980-12-31 0.08.0 CIRRMUNCOMRECFISDOMAUGOTHWLD
49330.01985-01-221985-12-31 12.50.0 CSTO
49669.01985-12-271985-12-31 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMRECFISDOMAUGOTHWLD
51269.01990-05-151990-12-31 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISDOMAUGWLD
53691.536311996-11-011997-12-31 1.730.0 CMUN
53872.01997-06-301997-12-31 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISDOMAUGWLD
58825.02011-01-212011-12-31 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISDOMAUGWLD

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 2,435 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 227 AF — 9% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2009 2,509 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 115 25.6
2010 1,776 3rd lowest of 15 · 73% of median 147 18.7
2011 3,614 15th lowest of 15 · 148% of median 130 28.0
2012 2,752 11th lowest of 15 · 113% of median 123 39.0
2013 3,328 14th lowest of 15 · 137% of median 163 32.8
2014 2,852 12th lowest of 15 · 117% of median 143 19.7
2015 1,485 2nd lowest of 15 · 61% of median 114 16.1
2016 1,862 4th lowest of 15 · 76% of median 121 22.2
2017 2,646 10th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 108 29.8
2018 2,435 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 157 21.1
2019 2,034 6th lowest of 15 · 84% of median 107 36.0
2020 2,297 7th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 96 31.9
2021 1,943 5th lowest of 15 · 80% of median 128 17.1
2024 2,906 13th lowest of 15 · 119% of median 105 24.7
2025 227 1st lowest of 15 · 9% of median 28 7.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 24 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record current 8738 measured days, newest 328 day(s) before the data's end (DWR publishes ~1 year in arrears)
record continuity patchy 54% of the irrigation seasons in 1950-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.