← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

WELLMAN DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 0600557 · DITCH · BOULDER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:46 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (96d5528) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: no administrative call record for this basin.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1917-03-08266th most senior of the 1867 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 0605206 (1916-08-15). Immediately behind: 0605251 (1917-11-03).

On MAINSTEM at river mile 10.4, it is 13th of 78 down the reach. Immediately upstream: NORTH BOULDER FARMERS D 12TH ST RETURN. Immediately downstream: PHIL HOGAN SEEPAGE DITCH.

Position on the modelled network, not a claim about whose water this is — a stream carries water from many rights at once, and diverted water returns to it.

Decreed rights (3)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
24538.01917-03-081926-06-21 50.00.0 CSTO
24868.01918-02-011935-01-09 70.00.0 CSTO
54681.01999-09-171999-12-31 0.00.0 CIRRINDFIRDOMOTH

Recorded use (last 4 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 76 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1953, came in at 58 AF — 76% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 4 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1950 30 1st lowest of 4 · 39% of median 4 5.0
1951 119 4th lowest of 4 · 156% of median 11 6.0
1952 95 3rd lowest of 4 · 124% of median 18 3.0
1953 58 2nd lowest of 4 · 76% of median 9 5.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 3 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record fragment 42 measured day(s) on file (under 180 -- a season, not a history)
record continuity unknown record too short to assess continuity (needs 2+ years of span and 180+ measured days)
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.