← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

HOWARD DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 0600580 · DITCH · SOUTH BOULDER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:06 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (96d5528) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: no administrative call record for this basin.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1860-04-0127th most senior of the 1867 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HOWELL DITCH (1859-12-01). Immediately behind: LOUISVILLE PL (1860-04-01).

On SOUTH BOULDER CREEK at river mile 15.3, it is 28th of 58 down the reach. Immediately upstream: NEW DRY CR CARRIER DITCH. Immediately downstream: HOWARD DITCH RETURN STRUCTURE.

Position on the modelled network, not a claim about whose water this is — a stream carries water from many rights at once, and diverted water returns to it.

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
3744.01860-04-011882-06-02 12.06390.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFIRDOMSTKAUGOTH

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,486 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,423 AF — 96% of that, and 6th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 1,601 12th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 195 9.0
2011 1,384 5th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 210 7.0
2012 1,699 15th lowest of 15 · 114% of median 213 6.4
2013 1,446 7th lowest of 15 · 97% of median 164 8.1
2014 1,320 3rd lowest of 15 · 89% of median 207 7.7
2015 1,267 2nd lowest of 15 · 85% of median 220 4.0
2016 1,346 4th lowest of 15 · 91% of median 213 7.7
2017 1,540 9th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 212 6.3
2018 1,608 14th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 213 7.2
2019 1,486 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 214 6.0
2020 1,547 10th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 214 6.7
2021 1,579 11th lowest of 15 · 106% of median 211 8.2
2022 1,107 1st lowest of 15 · 74% of median 211 5.4
2024 1,601 12th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 208 8.9
2025 1,423 6th lowest of 15 · 96% of median 208 5.6

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.