← My Water · Print / save as PDF
JENNY CREEK PIPELINE
Structure dossier · WDID 0600876 · PIPELINE · JENNY CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:48 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (96d5528) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1860-04-01 — 31st most senior of the 1867 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CREEKSIDE RANCH IRRIGATION DIVERSION (1860-04-01). Immediately behind: 0602418 (1860-04-01).
Decreed rights (7)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3744.0 | 1860-04-01 | 1882-06-02 | 23.413 | 0.0 | A | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISDOMSTKAUGSNO | |
| 3744.0 | 1860-04-01 | 1882-06-02 | 0.5607 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISDOMSTKAUGSNO | |
| 4641.0 | 1862-09-15 | 1882-06-02 | 87.9 | 0.0 | A | IRRCOMINDRECFISDOMSTKAUGSNOWLD | |
| 4641.0 | 1862-09-15 | 1882-06-02 | 0.66 | 0.0 | C | IRRCOMINDRECFISDOMSTKAUGSNOWLD | |
| 43829.43645 | 1969-06-30 | 1970-12-31 | 0.2 | 0.0 | C | MUNINDRECDOM | |
| 57744.0 | 2008-02-05 | 2008-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRCOMINDRECFISSTKAUGHUOSNOWLD | |
| 62090.0 | 2019-12-30 | 2008-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRCOMINDRECFISSTKAUGHUOSNOWLD |
Legal record & documents
14 decreed actions on record across
10 court cases:
19CW3250, 19CW3122, 08CW0305, W0324, 90CW0144, W7786, 16CW3015, 12CW0087, 07CW0231, 02CW0400.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
19CW3250 | 1 | 2008-12-31 | O |
19CW3122 | 1 | 2008-12-31 | O |
08CW0305 | 2 | 2008-12-31 | O |
W0324 | 1 | 1970-12-31 | S |
90CW0144 | 4 | 1970-12-31 | O, S |
W7786 | 1 | 1882-06-02 | O |
16CW3015 | 1 | 1882-06-02 | O |
12CW0087 | 1 | 1882-06-02 | O |
07CW0231 | 1 | 1882-06-02 | O |
02CW0400 | 1 | 1882-06-02 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
How good is our record of it?
Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 7 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | absent | no diversion records cached |
| record continuity | unknown | no record span to measure against |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.