← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BOULDER PL 3 AT BARKER R

Structure dossier · WDID 0600943 · PIPELINE · MIDDLE BOULDER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:51 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (96d5528) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: no administrative call record for this basin.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1859-11-1522nd most senior of the 1867 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 0600804 (1859-11-15). Immediately behind: BOULDER CR MIN FLOW C (1859-11-15).

On MIDDLE BOULDER CREEK at river mile -6.1, it is 3rd of 4 down the reach. Immediately upstream: BARKER MEADOW RES. Immediately downstream: KOSSLER RES.

Position on the modelled network, not a claim about whose water this is — a stream carries water from many rights at once, and diverted water returns to it.

Decreed rights (12)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
3606.01859-11-151882-06-02 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECDOM
3927.01860-10-011882-06-02 0.00.0 CMUN
4535.01862-06-011882-06-02 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECDOMALL
4900.01863-06-011882-06-02 0.00.0 CMUNALL
40740.388511956-05-151964-03-04 50.00.0 CSTOMUNINDFIRDOM
45290.38351954-12-311974-12-31 0.00.0 CMUN
52595.525941993-12-301994-12-31 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDFIRDOMAUG
52795.01994-07-191994-12-31 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDFIRDOMAUG
52958.01994-12-291994-12-31 0.00.0 CMUNALL
55141.02000-12-202000-12-31 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGPWR
60963.02016-11-282016-12-31 0.00.0 CMUN
61357.02017-12-272017-12-31 0.00.0 CMUN

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 3,806 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 11,429 AF — 300% of that, and 15th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 6,135 13th lowest of 15 · 161% of median 231 31.9
2011 5,340 12th lowest of 15 · 140% of median 297 27.0
2012 2,777 3rd lowest of 15 · 73% of median 129 25.6
2013 3,806 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 219 23.0
2014 2,987 5th lowest of 15 · 78% of median 234 17.4
2015 4,734 11th lowest of 15 · 124% of median 288 21.5
2016 3,296 7th lowest of 15 · 87% of median 258 21.3
2017 3,150 6th lowest of 15 · 83% of median 173 22.1
2018 3,870 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 183 24.9
2019 2,862 4th lowest of 15 · 75% of median 144 30.1
2020 3,961 10th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 179 27.2
2021 2,218 1st lowest of 15 · 58% of median 136 20.3
2022 2,756 2nd lowest of 15 · 72% of median 178 32.3
2023 8,107 14th lowest of 15 · 213% of median 205 35.9
2025 11,429 15th lowest of 15 · 300% of median 214 54.3

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (10/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 12 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record current 8610 measured days, newest 306 day(s) before the data's end (DWR publishes ~1 year in arrears)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 1989-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.