Hydrohistorian
Log in

← My Water  ·  All reservoirs in this district  ·  Print / save as PDF  · 

 ·  every download of this record carries its certificate id

LOUISVILLE RES NO 1

Structure dossier · WDID 0604209 · RESERVOIR · SOUTH BOULDER CREEK · DWR record · probably LOUISVILLE CITY OF’s (matched on DWR’s contact or an EPA intake name; verify below)

Louisville Res No 1 is a reservoir on South Boulder Creek in Colorado. This page is its public record: the water it has a right to, whether it may take it today, and its history, compiled from the Colorado Division of Water Resources.

Source DWR administrative record · verify at DWR structure ↗ Source DWR administrative record · verify at DWR diversion records ↗ Source Our computation, scored against a reference · scored against DWR's call analysis, see /methods

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-10-14 05:21 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260928 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (dd58e60) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Who owns it

DWR’s own records name no owner for a ditch, reservoir or well, so this comes from the source shown and can be out of date. Organisations only: a private landowner’s name is never listed.

The record and the river

In short

LOUISVILLE RES NO 1 holds 9 decreed rights on SOUTH BOULDER CREEK. As of 2026-09-27, 9 of them are out of priority under a call at admin 3622.00000 placed by HOWELL DITCH. 7 further calls state no district and sit outside this one, so they are counted here rather than assumed either way. In a median year over its last 5 recorded years it diverts 174 acre-feet. It was a party to 5 court cases that also touched 11 other structures.

Assembled from the figures on this page — every number above is checked against them before it is shown (10 checked). The detail, with its method, is in the cards below.

Download this structure

Everything on this page as data you can work with — and a README that makes it citable: the HydroBase snapshot it was built from, the build commit, what every column means, the method behind each derived figure, and that method's stated limits.

⇩ Full record (.zip) Print / save as PDF

Or one table at a time: rights.csv · annual_use.csv · curtailment_now.csv · court_cases.csv · co_parties.csv · call_climatology.csv

What is in the bundle
  • rights.csv — every decreed right, most senior first, with admin numbers, dates, amounts, uses and case numbers.
  • annual_use.csv — recorded diversion by year, with releases accounted separately.
  • curtailment_now.csv — each right's current priority status and how often it was out across analog years.
  • court_cases.csv — the cases attached to its rights.
  • co_parties.csv — the other structures that were parties to those cases. Not available anywhere else.
  • call_climatology.csv — how often each right has been out of priority by week of season, with confidence intervals and the seasons the record could actually judge.
  • README.txt — provenance, methods, limits, disclaimer, and links back to DWR's own records for verification.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it (storage). Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Dam safety

Dam LOUISVILLE NO. 1 (completed 1888)
Hazard class High
Condition at last inspection Satisfactory (2026-03-31)
Storage restriction None on file
Normal storage 206 AF
Physical status Active
Emergency action plan Yes

Source: DWR Dam Safety’s jurisdictional-dam inventory (damsafety/damsafetydaminfojd), refreshed weekly. Joined on this structure’s own WDID as DWR records it on the dam. Hazard class describes the consequence of failure, not the likelihood of it. DWR’s dam record.

Current administration

● Junior rights called out — call at RURAL DITCH (BOULDER CREEK, priority 1862-05-09).

● Fully called out — call at HOWELL DITCH (BOULDER CREEK, priority 1859-12-01).

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Under today's controlling call (HOWELL DITCH, priority 1859-12-01): 9 of this structure's 9 rights are out of priority now. (7 call(s) state no district and sit outside this one — not judged, not assumed.) In the 5 past years most like this one (2022, 2021, 2025, 2024, 2023), 9 of the rights shown below were out at least one week in at least one analog year.

Right (priority)NowAnalog years outMajority out by
1860-04-01 3744 ● out 1 of 5 —
1863-04-15 4853 ● out 5 of 5 2026-09-27
1864-05-01 5235 ● out 5 of 5 2026-09-27
1872-04-15 8141 ● out 5 of 5 2026-09-27
1873-06-01 8553 ● out 5 of 5 2026-09-27
1888-05-01 14001 ● out 5 of 5 2026-09-27
1888-05-15 14015 ● out 5 of 5 2026-09-27
1889-07-13 14439 ● out 5 of 5 2026-09-27
1896-04-01 20188 ● out 5 of 5 2026-09-27
How this table is built, and what it is not

“Now” compares each right's admin number with today's most senior applicable active call. The outlook uses flows at EAST BOULDER DITCH around 2026-09-27 (the newest reading on file) — currently 0% of that gage's own median for this window — to pick the 5 most similar past years with complete administration records (2005–2026). Only calls that verifiably apply count: DWR's own district statements in the call's set comments, a caller located in this district, or — on the same stream, where DWR records both stream miles (measured from the mouth) — a caller DOWNSTREAM of this structure. An upstream senior cannot demand water this diversion never deprives it of. Calls that state nothing and sit elsewhere are counted as unjudged rather than assumed, which also means the verified record is shorter than the raw one: early calls rarely state districts. For each week it finds the most senior call then in force; a right is out in that week exactly when that call is senior to it, which is why one line prices every right and juniors can be out while seniors keep diverting. “Majority out by” is the first week out in more than half the analog years. A frequency among named historical years, not a probability from a model, and not a forecast of what the division engineer will do. It says how often years whose flow resembled this one were under a call senior to this right in a given week. Snowpack, storage, and the actual administrative decisions of a given season are not modelled. Check the analog years listed: if they do not resemble this year to you, the outlook does not either.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1860-04-01 — 33rd most senior of the 1867 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 0602418 (1860-04-01). Immediately behind: MARSHALL LAKE (1860-04-01).

On SOUTH BOULDER CREEK at river mile 16.1, it is 33rd of 59 down the reach. Immediately upstream: EAST BOULDER DITCH. Immediately downstream: HECLA RES.

Position on the modelled network, not a claim about whose water this is — a stream carries water from many rights at once, and diverted water returns to it.

Decreed rights (9)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. Alt-pointAn absolute amount decreed at another structure that may be diverted here instead -- an alternate point of diversion or an exchange. DWR calls this the APEX amount; a right showing 0.0 absolute but an alt-point amount is exercised here under another structure's decree. Decreed forWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
3744.00000 1860-04-011882-06-02 0.0 AF 0.0 357.82 AF Irrigation, Municipal +1 W8500
4853.00000 1863-04-151882-06-02 0.0 AF 0.0 36.91 AF Municipal W9193
5235.00000 1864-05-011882-06-02 0.0 AF 0.0 82.6 AF Irrigation, Municipal +1 W8500
8141.00000 1872-04-151882-06-02 0.0 AF 0.0 1032.0 AF Irrigation, Municipal 83CW0319
8553.00000 1873-06-011882-06-02 0.0 cfs 0.0 17.514 cfs Irrigation, Municipal 83CW0319
14001.00000 1888-05-011900-12-19 0.0 AF 0.0 88.0 AF Irrigation, Municipal +7 92CW0079
14015.00000 1888-05-151907-03-13 290.0 AF 0.0 — Domestic CA4842
14439.00000 1889-07-131900-12-19 0.0 AF 0.0 62.29 AF Municipal, Augmentation +1 82CW0376
20188.16893 1896-04-011907-03-13 0.0 AF 0.0 14.5 AF Municipal, Augmentation +1 82CW0375

Amounts marked cfs are flow rates; AF are stored volumes (storage rights are decreed in acre-feet). An absolute amount of 0.0 beside an alt-point amount is not a dead right: the water is decreed at another structure, and that row records permission to divert it here instead (an alternate point or exchange). A case listing several numbers reflects the original decree plus later change cases.

Filings that would move water above this headgate

4 water-court applications in the monthly resumes name a structure on SOUTH BOULDER CREEK upstream of this headgate. A new right, exchange or change of use up there changes what arrives down here — the resume is the public notice, and the opposition window is how anyone affected answers it.

MonthCaseWhat it asksUpstream structuresOppose by
2026-08 2026CW3125 reasonable diligence LEYNER COTTONWOOD DITCH (0.9 mi up), ENTERPRISE DITCH (0.9 mi up), NEW DRY CR CARRIER DITCH (0.9 mi up), S BOULDER BEAR CR DITCH (3.9 mi up) +2 more 2026-10-31 (17d)
2026-06 2026CW3093 reasonable diligence LEYNER COTTONWOOD DITCH (0.9 mi up), ENTERPRISE DITCH (0.9 mi up), NEW DRY CR CARRIER DITCH (0.9 mi up), S BOULDER BEAR CR DITCH (3.9 mi up) +2 more 2026-08-31
2025-10 2025CW3137 reasonable diligence LEYNER COTTONWOOD DITCH (0.9 mi up), ENTERPRISE DITCH (0.9 mi up), NEW DRY CR CARRIER DITCH (0.9 mi up), S BOULDER BEAR CR DITCH (3.9 mi up) +2 more 2025-12-31
2025-04 2025CW3049 reasonable diligence LEYNER COTTONWOOD DITCH (0.9 mi up), ENTERPRISE DITCH (0.9 mi up), NEW DRY CR CARRIER DITCH (0.9 mi up), S BOULDER BEAR CR DITCH (3.9 mi up) +2 more 2025-06-30

Judged on this structure’s own named stream only — a filing on a tributary that joins upstream is not judged here. Filings that name structures only in prose, without a WDID, are invisible to this card. Reading aid, not legal advice; the deadline is computed from C.R.S. 37-92-302(3), and the court’s own notice controls.

How often is it out of priority?

Across the 11 seasons whose call record is complete enough to judge this structure (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026), week by week from April.

most senior right · admin 3744.00000 · never out of priority in these seasons
AprMayJunJulAugSep
middle right · admin 8553.00000 · peaks at 11 of 11 seasons
AprMayJunJulAugSep
most junior right · admin 20188.16893 · peaks at 11 of 11 seasons
AprMayJunJulAugSep

Snow sets the clock here. In the driest third of snow years (3 seasons), the call settled in for the season around June 3; in 1 of them it never lifted at all. In the middle third (5 seasons), the call settled in for the season around July 1 (June 17 to July 15 across those years). In the wettest third (3 seasons), the call settled in for the season around June 24 (June 3 to June 24 across those years); in 1 of them it never lifted at all.

Snow years ranked by the district’s April 1 snow-water percentile across 3 SNOTEL sites; 11 seasons carry both a snow reading and a judgeable call record. How the past played out, not a forecast.

Why only 11 seasons, and what the bars mean

Each bar is one week: how many of those seasons that right was out of priority under a call this site can lawfully attribute to this structure. Green is never, red is every season on record.

The short record is a property of DWR's data, not of the river. A call only counts against a structure when we can establish it applies — by the districts named in its set comments, or by stream mile on the same source. DWR did not begin stating affected districts routinely until about 2015: fewer than one call in ten can be judged before then, against roughly two in three since. A season we cannot judge is not a season without calls, so it is dropped rather than counted as quiet — 12 seasons dropped here.

This is a frequency over past seasons, not a forecast. It says nothing about what the division engineer will do this year.

Recorded use (last 5 years on record)

Years far under the decreed amount? That gap has a name — paper water vs. wet water, explained on this structure.

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 174 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2021, came in at 128 AF — 74% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 5 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1982 174 3rd lowest of 5 · 100% of median 40 7.9
1983 481 5th lowest of 5 · 276% of median 130 4.8
1984 328 4th lowest of 5 · 188% of median 72 4.3
1985 88 1st lowest of 5 · 51% of median 18 3.9
2021 128 2nd lowest of 5 · 74% of median 36 4.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 9 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record stale 296 measured days, but newest is 2005 day(s) before the data's end (target 450)
record continuity sparse 4% of the irrigation seasons in 1982-2021 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.

Hydrohistorian is free, with no ads — one server and a lot of public records. If it earns its keep, you can help keep it running.