Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
GREEN LAKE RES NO 2
Structure dossier · WDID 0604253 · RESERVOIR · NORTH BOULDER CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 01:49 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (5cd37f7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Current administration
● Fully called out — call at RURAL DITCH (BOULDER CREEK, priority 1862-05-09).
● Fully called out — call at JONES DONNELLY DITCH (SOUTH BOULDER CREEK, priority 1860-04-30).
● Fully called out — call at HOWARD DITCH (SOUTH BOULDER CREEK, priority 1860-04-01).
● Fully called out — call at LOWER LATHAM DITCH (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1885-11-20).
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1906-10-02 — 227th most senior of the 1867 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: GREEN LAKE RES NO 1 (1906-10-02). Immediately behind: GREEN LAKE RES NO 3 (1906-10-02).
Decreed rights (8)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20890.20728 | 1906-10-02 | 1926-06-21 | 139.97 | 0.0 | A | MUNCOMINDFIRDOM | |
| 45290.3835 | 1954-12-31 | 1974-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 52595.52594 | 1993-12-30 | 1994-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDFIRDOMAUG | |
| 52795.0 | 1994-07-19 | 1994-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDFIRDOMAUG | |
| 52958.0 | 1994-12-29 | 1994-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUNALL | |
| 55141.0 | 2000-12-20 | 2000-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGPWR | |
| 60963.0 | 2016-11-28 | 2016-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 61357.0 | 2017-12-27 | 2017-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN |
Legal record & documents
16 decreed actions on record across
9 court cases:
16CW3160, 00CW0226, 94CW0285, 94CW0284, 03CW0440, W7852, 86CW0123, CA6672, CA12111.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
16CW3160 | 2 | 2017-12-31 | S |
00CW0226 | 1 | 2000-12-31 | S |
94CW0285 | 1 | 1994-12-31 | S |
94CW0284 | 4 | 1994-12-31 | S |
03CW0440 | 1 | 1994-12-31 | S |
W7852 | 2 | 1974-12-31 | S |
86CW0123 | 1 | 1974-12-31 | S |
CA6672 | 3 | 1926-06-21 | S |
CA12111 | 1 | 1926-06-21 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 2 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 230 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1985, came in at 159 AF — 69% of that, and 1st lowest of the 2 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1977 | 301 | 2nd lowest of 2 · 131% of median | — | 11 | 20.0 |
| 1985 | 159 | 1st lowest of 2 · 69% of median | 40 | 3 | 40.0 |
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 8 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | fragment | 14 measured day(s) on file (under 180 -- a season, not a history) |
| record continuity | unknown | record too short to assess continuity (needs 2+ years of span and 180+ measured days) |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.