← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

GOOSE LAKE

Structure dossier · WDID 0604489 · RESERVOIR · NORTH BOULDER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:23 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (96d5528) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Current administration

● Fully called out — call at RURAL DITCH (BOULDER CREEK, priority 1862-05-09).

● Fully called out — call at JONES DONNELLY DITCH (SOUTH BOULDER CREEK, priority 1860-04-30).

● Fully called out — call at HOWARD DITCH (SOUTH BOULDER CREEK, priority 1860-04-01).

● Fully called out — call at LOWER LATHAM DITCH (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1885-11-20).

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: only 2 analog year(s) have both flow and a complete administration record; 4 needed.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1901-10-01137th most senior of the 1867 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 0605123 (1900-12-31). Immediately behind: 0605904 (1902-12-31).

On NORTH BOULDER CREEK at river mile -14.9, it is 7th of 14 down the reach. Immediately upstream: ALBION RES. Immediately downstream: ISLAND LAKE.

Position on the modelled network, not a claim about whose water this is — a stream carries water from many rights at once, and diverted water returns to it.

Decreed rights (9)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
18901.01901-10-011907-03-13 198.50.0 AMUNCOMINDFIRDOM
20699.01906-09-031907-03-13 261.2576.6 AMUNCOMINDFIRDOM
45290.38351954-12-311974-12-31 0.00.0 CMUN
52595.525941993-12-301994-12-31 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDFIRDOMAUG
52795.01994-07-191994-12-31 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDFIRDOMAUG
52958.01994-12-291994-12-31 0.00.0 CMUNALL
55141.02000-12-202000-12-31 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGPWR
60963.02016-11-282016-12-31 0.00.0 CMUN
61357.02017-12-272017-12-31 0.00.0 CMUN

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 795 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 900 AF — 113% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1997 928 11th lowest of 15 · 117% of median 27 40.0
1998 1,036 13th lowest of 15 · 130% of median 49 25.0
1999 1,036 13th lowest of 15 · 130% of median 31 30.0
2000 1,036 13th lowest of 15 · 130% of median 59 30.0
2006 694 7th lowest of 15 · 87% of median 20 25.0
2007 845 9th lowest of 15 · 106% of median 111 25.0
2009 522 5th lowest of 15 · 66% of median 10 30.0
2012 47 2nd lowest of 15 · 6% of median 34 4.3
2013 2 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.9
2015 514 4th lowest of 15 · 65% of median 61 30.3
2016 387 3rd lowest of 15 · 49% of median 107 11.6
2017 931 12th lowest of 15 · 117% of median 58 15.1
2018 626 6th lowest of 15 · 79% of median 24 21.2
2022 795 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 8 88.7
2024 900 10th lowest of 15 · 113% of median 19 80.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 9 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record stale 828 measured days, but newest is 797 day(s) before the data's end (target 450)
record continuity sparse 11% of the irrigation seasons in 1990-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.