← My Water · Print / save as PDF
LOWER WHEELER DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 0800910 · DITCH · TROUT CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:11 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (0576005) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Current administration
● Fully called out — call at LAST CHANCE DITCH 2 (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1863-12-30).
● Fully called out — call at NEVADA DITCH (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1865-12-30).
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1914-01-30 — 6394th most senior of the 21881 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 2301555 (1913-12-31). Immediately behind: 0801622 (1914-12-31).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44559.23405 | 1914-01-30 | 1972-12-31 | 1.5 | 0.0 | C | IRRSTK |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 65 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2010, came in at 1 AF — 2% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1986 | 63 | 6th lowest of 15 · 97% of median | 36 | 1.0 |
| 1987 | 54 | 4th lowest of 15 · 83% of median | 55 | 0.5 |
| 1988 | 20 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 31% of median | 19 | 0.8 |
| 1990 | 63 | 6th lowest of 15 · 97% of median | 39 | 1.5 |
| 1991 | 83 | 10th lowest of 15 · 128% of median | 46 | 1.0 |
| 1992 | 244 | 14th lowest of 15 · 375% of median | 83 | 1.5 |
| 1993 | 139 | 13th lowest of 15 · 214% of median | 40 | 2.0 |
| 1994 | 60 | 5th lowest of 15 · 92% of median | 31 | 1.0 |
| 1995 | 271 | 15th lowest of 15 · 417% of median | 107 | 1.5 |
| 1996 | 107 | 11th lowest of 15 · 165% of median | 62 | 1.0 |
| 1997 | 65 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 34 | 1.0 |
| 1998 | 65 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 26 | 1.5 |
| 1999 | 129 | 12th lowest of 15 · 198% of median | 93 | 1.5 |
| 2001 | 8 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 12% of median | 10 | 0.5 |
| 2010 | 1 | 1st lowest of 15 · 2% of median | 3 | 0.3 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.