Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

0800911

Structure dossier · WDID 0800911 · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:44 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (0576005) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Current administration

● Fully called out — call at LAST CHANCE DITCH 2 (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1863-12-30).

● Fully called out — call at NEVADA DITCH (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1865-12-30).

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1927-01-31 — 6460th most senior of the 21881 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 8003511 (1925-12-31). Immediately behind: 0803604 (1927-06-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
44559.281541927-01-311972-12-31 1.50.0 CIRRSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 79 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2001, came in at 6 AF — 8% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1986 42 4th lowest of 15 · 53% of median 23 1.0
1987 137 13th lowest of 15 · 173% of median 47 1.5
1988 99 11th lowest of 15 · 125% of median 47 1.5
1989 7 2nd lowest of 15 · 9% of median 16 0.2
1990 16 3rd lowest of 15 · 20% of median 9 1.0
1991 67 5th lowest of 15 · 85% of median 61 0.8
1992 81 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 83 0.5
1993 229 15th lowest of 15 · 290% of median 78 1.5
1994 79 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 41 1.0
1995 213 14th lowest of 15 · 270% of median 98 1.5
1996 107 12th lowest of 15 · 135% of median 62 1.0
1997 71 6th lowest of 15 · 90% of median 25 1.5
1998 74 7th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 26 1.5
1999 95 10th lowest of 15 · 120% of median 45 1.5
2001 6 1st lowest of 15 · 8% of median 10 0.5

How good is our record of it?

Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity partial missing name, structure type, water source
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1290 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 23% of the irrigation seasons in 1975-2001 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.